My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-1975 Council Meeting Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1975
>
10-27-1975 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2015 2:45:40 PM
Creation date
4/17/2015 2:45:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL Y�IEETING HELD OCTOBER 27, 1975 Page 16 <br /> � r�1r, Henry P•Zuhich, Building & Zoninc� Administrator, PARK DEDICATION FEES <br /> ydiscussed consideration of revising the current <br /> l0a park dedication fee stating that our <br /> • present platting procedures require a park <br /> � dedication fee of 1/10 the area or l00 of the <br /> raca land value of the affected property. <br /> � Applicants of several recent subdivisions have <br /> � questioned this palicy. They feel the extent of <br /> the subdivision should be taken into consideration, <br /> • <br /> On reviewing the matter, I feel we should consider <br /> � some changes. At present, a developer is assessed <br /> � the identical fee regardless of the extent of <br /> his proposalo 6Ve might consider our open space <br /> r policy and assess developers on a basis of the <br /> extent of each subdivision proposal. Our �ark <br /> � dedication fee could be based at a ratio of the <br /> extend of the subdivisiono A fraction of the <br /> � fee equal to the fraction of the extent of the <br /> � proposed subdivision. <br /> S tae might also consider extending the same policy <br /> on subdivision proposals requesting denser <br /> � development than the zoning at the time of <br /> applicationv <br /> �Tayor Searles stated that in an open space area <br /> � there is not the demand for parks as there is in <br /> i dense type developed areas and that there should <br /> be a middle ground when establishing park <br /> *, dedication fees. It was recommended that this <br /> be reviewed at a joint meeting with the City <br /> r Council and Commissions, <br /> � I�Ir, Henry i�Tuhich, Building & Zoning Aclministrator, AZULTIPLE DWELLINGS <br /> • reported to the City Council that the Planning <br /> Commission has not had sufficient time to revieca <br /> « the multiple dwelling zoning ordinancea. <br /> i Searles moved, t�lelsh seconded, to designate JOIAIT AZEETING <br /> December 10, 1975, 7e30 P,T�2. as a joint meeting <br /> ! of the City Council and Planning Commission to <br /> • review the multi-dwelling zoning ordinance and <br /> park dEdication fees. T�iotionp Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> � Paurus moved, Welsh seconded, to adopt the proposed PROCEDURE CHANGES <br /> procedure changes for the Planning Commission Planning Commission <br /> � as pro�osed by the Building & Zoning Administrator <br /> and approvea by the Planning Commission establishing <br /> � t�ao action meetings each month, PZotion, Ayes (4) - <br /> �ays (0) e <br /> � <br /> � <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.