My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: retaining wall
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
L
>
Leaf Street
>
75 Leaf Street - 05-117-23-11-0014
>
Correspondence
>
Re: retaining wall
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:15:45 PM
Creation date
4/26/2017 2:59:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
75
Street Name
Leaf
Street Type
Street
Address
75 Leaf St
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0511723110014
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conclusions: <br /> Each of the boulder walls have adequate size, as the minimum boulder wall depth(�20") is more than <br /> adequate for the given site surcharge conditions (no dead load, no live load, or top slope), minimum wall <br /> batter(10°), and the maximum wall height(3.8'). A 12" minimum boulder would actually meet minimum <br /> safety requirements of: <br /> SF sliding= 1.50 <br /> SF overturning= 1.50 <br /> SF bearing= 2.0 <br /> The walls have adequate spacing between them to avoid surcharging the lower wall, creating a global <br /> stability issue. The minimum spacing requirement is 2H1, where H1 is the height of the lower wall. The <br /> case for an acceptable margin of safery is further strengthened by the fact there is no slopes above, between <br /> or below the walls, the soil on the site is good material, and the boulders are oversized relative to the <br /> maximum wall heights. <br /> Therefore, it is my professional opinion that the boulder retaining walls meet all minimum industry safety <br /> factors, and will function properly and safely. These conclusions retained are based on my professional <br /> opinion. These opinions are arrived in accordance with accepted engineering practices in this time and <br /> location. No other warranty is implied or intended. Should additional information become available, this <br /> report may be modified based on the new data. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Michael. R.Johnson, PE <br /> President/CEO <br /> Civil Design Professiona/s • 8609 Lynda/e Ave.5.,Suite 200 8/oomington,MN 55420 • O�ce 612-284-3696 • www.cdp-us.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.