Laserfiche WebLink
r ._ � <br /> Mr. and Mrs. Lee Harren <br /> August 17, 1992 <br /> Page 2 <br /> connection to go around the pool, but which was not otherwise a <br /> limiting factor. The State Health Department requires that the . <br /> setback between a well and an air tested sewer line must be a minimum <br /> of 20'. You suggested that a more feasible and less expensive <br /> connection route would be around the east side of your driveway to the <br /> southeast corner of your property. It appears your connection could <br /> take either a southwest or southeast route and not affect your well or <br /> neighboring wells. <br /> City staff and consultants then investigated the feasibility of <br /> extending a stub to your southeast lot corner, and found that such a <br /> connection was very feasible, via an additional 120' extension of a <br /> lateral already proposed within Gardner's driveway which served <br /> Gardner and Anderson. A stub would be extended from that lateral to <br /> your southeast property boundary. <br /> In your April 29th letter you suggested an alternate route along the <br /> portion of Outlot D located west of Landmark Drive, but there is no <br /> 30'-40' clear outlot/easement along the west side of Outlot D. In <br /> fact, as the attached road plan indicates, the pavement abuts the west <br /> line of Outlot D for a good distance and there is a 20' clear area <br /> east of the road in which sewer might be constructed, but this sti 11 <br /> leaves the problem of having to replace a large portion of the cul-de- <br /> sac and cutting through the tiill to serve Kyle's. <br /> The City would be responsible for obtaining all necessary easements <br /> across adjacent properties to bring a stub to your property boundary <br /> from the east. The cost of providing service to your southeast <br /> boundary would be absorbed within the general sewer project and would <br /> not increase your assessment. <br /> During an executive session at their July 27th meeting, the City <br /> Council reviewed your concerns and the various connection options. <br /> Council directed that staff proceed on the basis that your property <br /> wi 11 be served by a stub extended to the southeast boundary of your <br /> property. A copy of the staff inemo from that meeting is attached. <br /> I hope this helps to clari�y the City's position on providing sewer <br /> service to your property. We can discuss these issues further at our <br /> meeting on the 26th. <br /> Sincerely�, <br /> �� � <br /> � ��i'`��1�'-��"_--� <br /> 7 <br /> Ron Moorse <br /> City Administrator <br /> RM/ch <br />