My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2017 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
03-13-2017 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 8:59:22 AM
Creation date
4/26/2017 8:59:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday March 13,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 12. #17-3903 ALEX UGORETS,2520 SHADYWOOD ROAD,SKETCH PLAN—Continued- <br /> Goodrum stated the wetlands for this property are on the edge of the site so it would only be a small <br /> percentage. Goodrum stated he would estimate it at under 10 percent. Discussions have been had with <br /> the Watershed District and they were able to walk the property. Goodrum indicated they will be meeting <br /> the Watershed District's requirements and that they were pleased with the approach being taken to the <br /> property. <br /> Goodrum indicated they also met with Hennepin County and they looked at the best access point for the <br /> site. Hennepin County indicated they were fine with combining access to this site with the Freshwater <br /> site. Goodrum stated based on their experience,the development would have a very small impact to the <br /> flow of traffic but that they are prepared to submit a formal traffic study. <br /> Goodrum stated when they were designing the sketch plan,they wanted this building to be <br /> complementary to the Freshwater building because they do not want it to have a negative impact to the <br /> office building. Being proposed are similar type features to the Freshwater building,especially as it <br /> relates to the height. The front of the Freshwater building is 30 feet,the height of this building is 30 feet <br /> in the front, and the penthouse steps up another nine feet in the back corner on the far side of the property. <br /> Goodrum stated the purpose of the penthouse is to provide beautiful views,meet market demand, and to <br /> match the height of the Freshwater building,which is 54 feet tall from the back. <br /> Goodrum indicated they used the Freshwater building to match this building and that it will have the same <br /> visual impact as the Freshwater building. As you move south past the building,the penthouse is stepped <br /> down and the building goes down to 31 feet. Goodrum indicated that is a transitional area from the <br /> Freshwater into the residential area. <br /> Goodrum stated the reason for that height is because the ground slopes 12 feet down into the wetland <br /> area. Goodrum commented it makes more sense to use the natural topography and having the proposed <br /> elevation than it would to haul in a bunch of fill. The lowest floor is the exposed parking garage,which <br /> will have screening around it. Goodrum stated they could bring in a bunch of dirt to cover the bottom two <br /> stories but that would result in hauling a lot of dirt into the site and does not work with the natural <br /> topography. Goodrum stated they are hoping the height is something the City will not consider to be a <br /> negative impact, especially since that corner of the proposed building matches the height of the <br /> Freshwater building. Goodrum noted the building is also set back from the road to avoid creating a tunnel <br /> effect. <br /> In addition,a berm will be constructed as well as landscaping to help block headlights and to help screen <br /> the building. Goodrum commented they spent a considerable amount of time fitting the building on the <br /> property and have it conform to the natural topography. <br /> Seals asked if there is a potential to put a right-turn lane into this property. <br /> Barnhart stated the County would likely object to that. In addition,the wetland is also fairly close to that <br /> area,which is where some separation would be required. Barnhart noted there is a right-in/right-out at the <br /> north end of the parking lot. Hennepin County would like to get rid of that at some point but at this time <br /> they are willing to accept that. <br /> Page 17 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.