Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 13,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> White stated he was planning on picking the shed up with a bobcat when the holes are dug and that he is <br /> trying to avoid hauling a machine in to move it now. <br /> Walsh noted removal of the shed would be part of the conditions for the variance. <br /> White indicated he would be happy to move it. White stated he lives out in Mayer and that it would be <br /> cumbersome to bring in some equipment to move it now. White stated he would like to do it at the time <br /> the addition is constructed. <br /> Crosby moved,Seals seconded,to adopt RESOLUTION NO.6721,a Resolution Approving <br /> Variances from Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-420,File No. 17-3889,for the property located <br /> at 2170 Prospect Avenue,with the condition that the shed will be removed under the conclusions, <br /> order and conditions. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 15. #17-3890-DENALI CUSTOM HOMES OB/0 STEVE AND STACIA ANDERSEN,517 <br /> FERNDALE ROAD NORTH,AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCE—RESOLUTION NO.6722. <br /> David Bieker,Denali Custom Homes,and Steve Andersen,Applicant,were present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting approval of an after-the-fact variance to permit two entrance <br /> monument pillars to remain as constructed 3.5 and 4 feet from the pavement of the road where a 10-foot <br /> setback is required. <br /> At their January meeting,the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the application. <br /> Following the public hearing and discussion,the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to deny the request for <br /> after-the-fact variances. <br /> A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been provided for Council's <br /> consideration. <br /> David Bieker, 17229 Fagerness Point Road,Denali Custom Homes, stated Denali always tries to abide by <br /> the rules of the City and the building permit process. During the construction of the home,a building <br /> permit was pulled. As part of the process of this application, a landscape plan was not required but is <br /> required as part of a building permit now. Bieker stated had a landscape plan been required,they <br /> probably would not have encountered these issues. <br /> Bieker stated as they moved through the construction of the home,they came to a point where they could <br /> put a landscaping plan together. A pool was also going to be constructed on the property. The permit <br /> was pulled for the pool and the survey was updated during that process to show all the landscaping <br /> features as well as the monuments. It was noted on the landscaping plan that these structures would be <br /> constructed on the property. <br /> Bieker stated they were not aware they needed a separate monument permit separate from the building <br /> permit. Bieker indicated they were under the impression that this was an actual road since it is deemed a <br /> private road. Bieker stated Denali built the house to the east of this property as well and everyone in the <br /> neighborhood always referred to it as a private driveway. The road is not maintained by the City, is not <br /> lighted,and there are many obstacles located closer to the road than the monuments, such as trees and <br /> Page 7 of 18 <br />