Laserfiche WebLink
� , . <br /> � ; ':'.ork �ession - July 15, 1975 Page 3 <br /> • <br /> � Ir a court would determine that this is annronriate zonin� �;OR'I�� STAP. <br /> for tllis property we shoulcl then he allowecl to dock the same a•�nnI_,?A <br /> � number of comnany owned boats ancl enjoy the same riQhts as <br /> any other property owner, without licensing and only subject <br /> � to tlie same restrictions that are im�osed on nrivated <br /> �ropert}� owners. � � <br /> • <br /> � '':e feel that the restrictions noted on our license for 1971 in <br /> connection wi.th our dock on Crystal Bay are not consistent with <br /> � olzr property rinhts or even with tlle previ_ous use history of the <br /> property or nossiblv even with ��rliat is allowed bv tlie ordinance. <br /> � }, rr�]TY RIGIIT OF i�IAY---Not ta.kin� specific issue at this time <br /> � with the intent of this �ara�*raph, we feel that Henne�in <br /> �;otmtv is i.n a better nosi.tion to �ictate ?lo�,� this nronertv <br /> � '�e utilize�3. � � � <br /> r �� siun u�, l,:e fecl t'zat �11 act.:i_or ta�:en :in t�ie *�a_�t �everal vears <br /> + reqarding �-2 zonin,s� and licensing restrictions and regulations <br /> are quite arl�itrary and descriminatory. Throu�*hout the formulation <br /> � of "cha�ter 73' , to the best of our l�owledfie not one nerson or <br /> husiness affected was consulted or auestianec� as to conditions <br /> � neculiar to the o�erations. �ne would think that ive wl�o are af_fect- <br /> ec3 would at least be best able to provide specific information re- <br /> � lating to the pronerty use in �rono that would have been beneficial <br /> i_n arriving at any conclusions. As it was, a totally new and <br /> • {-iiite specific ordinance was drafted and passed with� no apParent <br /> ., innut from persons experienced and lmowledgeable in specific use <br /> of Orono B-2 zoning districts. <br /> � t�nder the circumstances, we feel it is too late and auite i.uireal- <br /> � istic to attempt to resolve any of the areas in question prior to <br /> issuance of a license for 1975. There are too many interrelated <br /> � areas of concern and conflict to come to grips with such as our <br /> c�uestions caith cl�pter 73, applications for building permit and <br /> • seawall and the issue relating to our dock length, t�,e respect- <br /> fully request that our license be granted as last years and <br /> � t?-�at iae work toQetiler toward 1976 and future years. <br /> � '�ouncilrnan Norman Paurus stated that the letter �aas discrir�inatory <br /> � znd unreasonable and that the B-2 h�.a.rina corrmiittee and City Cotincil <br /> ��ad worked extremely hard to find a solution to the riarina� nrobler�. <br /> s - <br /> '�ile findings of fact to be presented to the City Council are: <br /> • A'}�e oresent use of the dock located on Crystal Bay is not <br /> cor.s istant 1ti�itli tlze: " <br /> � l. Zoninp <br /> � ?. intent of original issuance of license <br /> �. previous usa�e <br /> � �� . ori�ir,ai.l.v t��c ar�� ;r nuestion ��.�� -:e,ne-i resic�e��t�l <br /> • <br /> � ���e,.rlr.,� r:i�lj;�t�rncc': r��eet.i�;n �t _ e .., , <br /> i <br /> / <br />