My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-2017 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
04-10-2017 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 10:55:25 AM
Creation date
4/25/2017 10:55:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,Apri110,2017 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 21. #17-3921 CITY OF ORONO,TEXT AMENDMENT: ESCROW AGREEMENTS AND <br /> FINANCIAL GUARANTEES—ORDINANCE NO. 190,Third Series (Continued) <br /> The ordinance also modifies the language to only require as-built surveys for principal buildings. An as- <br /> built survey is intended to guarantee that the structure and all other improvements are consistent with the <br /> approved plans. In addition,the dra8 ordinance also modifies/clarifies the requirement that owners must <br /> pay costs incurred as part of their project. <br /> Under the new ordinance,the City will no longer require escrow agreements and incorporates language to <br /> include in the permits and applications to negate the need for this separate document. <br /> Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance as presented. <br /> Printup asked if the City can assess someone if they do not pay the costs incurred by the City. <br /> Mattick stated in order to assess something, it must be against the property owner, and a lot of times the <br /> applications are made by a builder or an architect. Mattick stated the costs are usually not paid if the <br /> project experiences problems and typically the property owner is not aware of the outstanding costs. <br /> Mattick stated there is language that allows the City to assess those fees,but that there will be some <br /> exposure. Mattick stated he is not sure at this point whether it will help the City or not. <br /> Mattick noted approximately ten years ago Orono had a difficult time collecting on these fees and the <br /> City was left on the hook for several hundred thousand dollars,which was why the current ordinance was <br /> put in place. Mattick stated to his understanding the system in place has been working but that it is a <br /> balancing act between protecting the City's financial stake and being fair to the consumer. <br /> Walsh stated these code issues involve philosophical discussions and that they are trying to make the <br /> ordinances fair to the 85 percent of people who comply with the laws rather than penalizing them. Walsh <br /> stated the City will be handling the other 15 percent differently. <br /> Walsh stated if someone wants a certificate of early occupancy, a person with a$100,000 house has to <br /> pay the same amount of money as the person with a$300,000 house, which results in a greater burden <br /> being on the smaller property owner. Walsh stated the City is attempting to balance the risk of allowing <br /> people to get things done easier or quicker but that it does not guarantee the project will be done correctly. <br /> Seals asked what neighboring cities do. <br /> Barnhart stated escrows are not uncommon and that every city he has worked in has required an escrow. <br /> Escrows are usually tied to pollution control or consulting fees and that Staff is not proposing to remove <br /> financial guarantees for a temporary certificate of occupancy. Barnhart noted the Code Review <br /> Committee will be reviewing the escrow amount that should be required. <br /> Page 17 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.