Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> WORK SESSION �INUTES HELD APRIL 5, 19`: 4 Page 2 <br /> The Council then discussed with I.D.Se the <br /> � concept of park space and transfer of credits. <br /> The Council referred to the Minutes of the <br /> • Regular Council meeting of November 27, 1973, <br /> in which it clearly stated that for property <br /> • dedicated no credits would be transferred <br /> � from it to other I.DaSe owned properties. <br /> The Council clearly stated that they have <br /> r no desire to transfer credits from buildable <br /> land to other buildable land. In a general <br /> � discussion of conditions 17-18-19 as listed <br /> in I.D.Se ' s letter, the question came up <br /> � about credits and the Council's desire to <br /> start talking about actual numberse The <br /> � Council had a discussion concerning whether <br /> � or not we could talk about park dedication <br /> of property not being discussed and the <br /> � Council' s general feeling was no, we could not. <br /> � The Council in discussing conditions ;;18 and <br /> �11, in regard to the parking area behind the <br /> • proposed office building. An issue came up <br /> as to how deep the current zoning should go <br /> and the scope of its use, whether it should <br /> � be 250' or 350' back from the road. It was <br /> concerned that Parcel F should have a 50 ' <br /> ygreen space dedicated in that area. <br /> • The Council asked the City Attorney to make <br /> • some comments in regard to conceptual ��pproval <br /> of a project meanse The City Attorney merely <br /> � stated that a conceptual approval is viable <br /> that under a situation like this, the approval <br /> � of zoning is a last item and if necessary we <br /> can at a later date, require IeD.S. to replat. <br /> , As far as making sure that IeD.S. will perform <br /> what it says it will perform cantractors bonds <br /> • for code violations can be required and filed <br /> • in the City offices. There is no question but <br /> that through the bonding process the City can <br /> � require I.DeS. to perform all of the conditions <br /> agreed upon between the Council and IoDoSo if <br /> the project is approvedo <br /> • Both Council and I,DoS. expressed concern over <br /> • having open ended items involved in considering <br /> this projecto It is hoped that we ��ill be able <br /> � to clarify and close out each item as it comes <br /> up. In regard to landscaping, the Planning <br /> � Commission requests that 12� of the site be <br /> put in landscaping is acceptable to I.DaSo and <br /> if the Council wished to state any specific <br /> criteria of that landscaping, they should do <br /> so as to whether it will be greenbelt, burms, <br /> � or a combination of both or whatevere <br /> � <br />