My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
09-12-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 1:34:55 PM
Creation date
4/4/2017 3:54:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
812
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July18, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />RPUD standards require that 10 percent of the development site be provided as a private recreation area <br />or open space to serve the residents of the development. The wetlands, which encompass a significant <br />portion of the development, act as open space but are not accessible for recreation purposes since the <br />wetlands will be placed within individual lots rather than as a separate commons area. <br />In addition to the creation of a private recreation area to serve the residents of the development, the City <br />requires dedication of 8 percent of the land as public park or payment of the equivalent value in cash. <br />The nearest public open space is the Lydiard Beach area located to the south of the site. <br />The Planning Commission should consider the following in connection with the preliminary plat review: <br />Is the Commission comfortable with the level of flexibility requested, recognizing that RPUD <br />standards require a significant level of development flexibility. Does the Commission have any <br />concerns regarding the lot widths, setbacks, or other RPUD standards for which flexibility is <br />required in this proposal? <br />2. Is the Commission comfortable moving the project forward, recognizing that the landscaping <br />plan, engineering and storm water management plans have not been fully reviewed. <br />Should trails or sidewalks be provided to connect this neighborhood with the community at large? <br />4. Is it imperative that 10 percent private open space be provided by the developer? <br />Should the Planning Commission wish to approve the applications, Staff recommends the following <br />conditions: <br />The City should identify alternate sites for higher density development if the Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment is approved. <br />2. Rezoning to RPUD, to be formally approved at the time of final plat approval. <br />Page 4 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.