Laserfiche WebLink
MEWaES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMKON. MEETING <br />Monday, August 15, 2016 <br />6:30 o'elock p.m. <br />V <br />Ga#Ijron stated to his belief they would be allowed to but that it would be a question for the City Attorney <br />to answer. Gaffron stated if the City decided it needed the easement area, the wall would not be allowed <br />to be rebuilt if it interfered with anything within the area. <br />Thiesse stated he would like that spelled out in the agreement. <br />Peter Johnson stated he is here on behalf of the applicants and can answer any questions the Plamling <br />Commission may have. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m, <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. <br />Schoenzeit stated perhaps allowing encroachment ageements to be approved administratively could be <br />discussed at the next Planning Commission work session. <br />Thiesse noted it requires a conditional use permit. <br />Leskinen noted the issue with this application relates to the retaining wall being located in a drainage and <br />Utility easement. <br />Curtis stated if the wail were located out of the easement area, then it would require a conditional use <br />permit and not an encroachment agreement. <br />Thiesse stated the public should also be able to comment on the matter. <br />Leskinen commented it appears to be a reasonable request as long as an encroachment agreement is <br />entered into. <br />Page 3 of 32 <br />