09-12-2016 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

16-3847 Shadywood Villas July 18, 2016 Page 9 RPUD standards requires a significant level of development flexibility. Does Planning Commission have any concerns about the lot widths, setbacks or other RPUD standards for which flexibility is required in this proposal? 4. Is the Commission comfortable moving the project forward, recognizing that the landscaping plan, engineering and storm -water management plans have not been fully vetted. 5. Should trails or sidewalks be provided to connect this neighborhood with the community at large? 6. Is it imperative that 10% private open space be provided by the developer? 7. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Staff Recommendation This development proposal exhibits a significant level of refinement as a result of the developer's response to issues raised during the Sketch Plan Review process and primary Staff comments. Discussion of the above topics and any conclusions reached by the Planning Commission should provide applicant and staff with direction as to whether or how the proposed plat should be further revised. Any remaining topics left unaddressed to date should be brought up for discussion. The Planning Commission may recommend approval or denial of the three actions requested or any combination thereof. If denial is recommended, reasons should be given. The Planning Commission may also choose to table the application, allowing the developer and staff to address any issues raised. Should the Commission wish to approve the applications, the following conditions are suggested: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, with the direction that that the City should identify alternate sites for higher density development. Rezoning to RPUD, to be formally approved at the time of final plat approval. Preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Flexibility being granted for the lot area, width and setback standards of the RPUD District. Hardcover will be limited to the assigned Tier 4 level of 50% on each individual lot. The 0.50 FAR shall be adhered to on each individual lot. 2. Development shall be subject to adherence to the findings included in the Conservation Design report, also subject to removal of buckthorn on the site. 3. Significant trees to be preserved to the extent possible and as shown on the landscaping plans. 4. Applicant to confirm with SHPO that that there are no archaeological sites within the property. 5. Preliminary plat to be reviewed by Park Commission and Fire Chief for comments and recommendations prior to Council review of preliminary plat.