Laserfiche WebLink
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region <br /> ProjecUSite 2560 Kelly Ave City/County: Orono,Hennepin Sampling Date: 5/24/14 <br /> ApplicanUOwner: Intemational Ministerial Fellowship State: MN Sampling Point: SP 1-7 Up <br /> Investigator(s): DR,FJS 3ection,Township,Range: T117N R23W S20 <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): hilislope Local relief(concave,convex,none): flat <br /> Slope(°/a): 15 Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83 <br /> Soil Map Unit Name Lester loam,morainic,18 to 25 percent slopes JWI Classification: PEM/SS1 C(or none) <br /> Are GimatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? N (If no,explain in remarks) <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed7 Are"normal circumstances" <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) <br /> Hydrophytic vegetation present? N <br /> Hydric soil present? N Is the sampied area wkhin a wetlandT N <br /> Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: <br /> Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separete report.) <br /> �on map units seem to ovenap at trns pomt so sou map urnt aiso comes up as nougnton ana nnusKego so <br /> depressional,0 to 1 percent slopes.NWI appears slightly offset so NWI classification at this specific point is probabl <br /> VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute Dominan Indicator pomfnance Test Worksheet <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species <br /> 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 50 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) <br /> 2 Ce/tis occidentalis 30 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant <br /> 3 U/mus americana 10 N FACW Species Across all Strata: 8 (B) <br /> 4 Quercus rubra 10 N FACU Percent of Dominant Species <br /> 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 50.00% (A/B) <br /> 100 =Total Cover <br /> S�a lina/Shrub straturt (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet <br /> 1 Rhamnus cathartica 40 Y FAC Total%Cover of: <br /> 2 Comus rugosa 10 Y UPL OBL species 0 x 1= 0 <br /> 3 FACW species 70 x 2= 140 <br /> 4 FAC species 83 x 3= 249 <br /> 5 FACU species 44 x 4= 176 <br /> 50 =Total Cover UPL species 25 x 5= 125 <br /> Herb sVatum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 222 (A) 690 (B) <br /> 1 Cau/ophyllum thalictroides 15 Y UPL Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.11 <br /> 2 Alliaria petio/ata 10 Y FAC <br /> 3 Arotium minus 8 Y FACU HydrophyUc Vegetation Indicators: <br /> 4 Arisaema triphyllum 5 N FACW Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation <br /> 5 Geranium macu/atum 5 N FACU Dominance test is>50% <br /> 6 Hydrophyllum virginianum 3 N FAC Prevalence index is s3.0` <br /> 7 Po/ygonatum bifiorum 3 N FACU Morphogical adaptations*(provide <br /> 8 Asarum canadense 3 N FACU supporting data in Remarks or on a <br /> 9 Urtica dioica 2 N FACW separate sheet) <br /> 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation" <br /> 54 =Total Cover (explain) <br /> Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) <br /> •Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrdogy must be <br /> 1 Parthenocissus quinquefolia 15 Y FACU present,unless disturbed or problematic <br /> 2 Vitis riparia 3 N FACW rop y c <br /> 18 =Total Cover �ege�tion <br /> present? N <br /> Remarks:(InGude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) <br /> Neither C. rugosa nor C.thalictroides seem to have wetland indicator status. Past practice has been to desingate I <br /> species as Upland. <br /> US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region <br />