Laserfiche WebLink
� ' <br /> � i�INUTES OF A SPECIAL F�IEETING HELD APRIL 2, 1974 Page 2 <br /> � isssue is no alteration of the present <br /> �roposal. <br /> � Items �2-B & #2-C, under A, I.D.S. agrees <br /> to the conditions. <br /> • <br /> B. This particular condition--was felt to be <br /> � no pro�iem; �however, Councilman iiassengale <br /> � proposed a variance to the setback requirements <br /> and the question is whether we move Keily <br /> � Avenue or the apa�tment house. <br /> � C. The Council at this time clarified caith <br /> I.U.S. that a combination of burm and greenbelt <br /> � in a landscape design must }�e worked out to <br /> � satisfactory a=tistic criteria. The Council <br /> informed I.D.S. that a burm in and of itself <br /> � is not adequate. tae must have a complete <br /> landscaping concept which will be approved <br /> � by the Orono Council. <br /> • D, i�Io obj ections �vere stated by the I.D>S. <br /> • to the conditions in this paragraph. <br /> � E. The Council stated to I.D.S. that the <br /> concern over storm water drainage is a <br /> �ajor consideration in the proposal. It is <br /> he City' s desire to appoint our own <br /> � engineer to work with I.D.S. and the <br /> 6aatershed District to consider diverting <br /> • the storm water to either hehind the I'.T+I.B.I. <br /> or to the northeast corner of the intersection <br /> � of #15 and #19 or possibly the necessary <br /> � upgrading of the existing watershed to the <br /> south, which will handle the storm waters <br /> � generated by the shopping center. The City <br /> is willing to consider alternatives in this <br /> • area but the £act remains that there is a <br /> storm water problem to the south of the I.D.S. <br /> � proposal now and under no circumstances does <br /> � the City of Orono want to get involved in <br /> having to have sto,rm water assessmer.ts put on <br /> � private property which are down stream from <br /> the I.D.S. proposal, because the I.D.S. <br /> � �roposal may have caused a storzn water <br /> prok�lem which the existing situ�tion cannot <br /> • handle. <br /> � F. It was discussed briefly in A above and <br /> � it was felt that realistic credits would be <br /> considered in view of how the property is <br /> � zoned now. <br /> • �. The City Council suggested that a <br /> straight line separating the zoned areas <br /> • be three-hundred feet straight across and I.D.S <br /> • <br /> • <br />