Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> • WORK SESSION MINUTES, NOVEMBER 2, 1974 Page 2 <br /> Van Nest felt that there should be one elevation <br /> contour on each marsh to define more accurately <br /> � the area of each one for legal purposes. Members <br /> felt there should be more study on this matter, <br /> such as, vegetation regulation and duck pond <br /> regulations and this should be placed on the <br /> next regular agenda; also, this study should be <br /> referenced in any future zoning and rezoning <br /> and should be officially adopted and become <br /> � part of Ordinance No. 125. <br /> Searles passed out a rough draft of the B-2 <br /> study committee, also, a boat density policy <br /> � statement by Lake Minnetonka Conservation <br /> . District. He now read Part I of the report <br /> voicing the overall concern for commercial <br /> usage of the lake. In conjunction with this, <br /> he presented a series of photos showing the <br /> � present configuration of the B-2 areas as <br /> compared with these areas 25 years ago. He <br /> � was at a seminar at the University of Wisconsin <br /> and it was brought out at this seminar that it <br /> would take Lake Minnetonka 25 years to flush <br /> • itself out. <br /> He now read report #II dealing with the special LAKESHORE COMMERCIAL <br /> situation involving lakeshore commercial on the <br /> � southwest shore of Maxwell Bay. After reading <br /> the report, he asked members two questions to <br /> begin discussion. <br /> � 1. Is the thrust of this correct? <br /> 2 . Does it leave elements out? <br /> Massenagle asked if there was any criteria on <br /> commercial usage from the DNR. Searles stated <br /> � that while there was no documentation, the DNR <br /> has worked very closely with L.M.C.D. <br /> � <br /> The B-2 committee felt that one thing left out <br /> � of the study was the outrage of the people <br /> living in this area. <br /> Massengale felt that the present B-2 zoning <br /> ordinance was not working and there was a <br /> , definite need to enact a workable ordinance <br /> and then have good enforcement. <br /> Malkerson questioned whether the complete <br /> usage of the B-2 area was any longer in the <br /> public interest. <br /> � Massengale asked whether there was a degradation <br /> of property values in this type of usage. The <br /> Mayor instructed the staff to get a report from <br /> the assessor on this consideration. <br />