My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-07-1972 Council Minutes Joint Meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
09-07-1972 Council Minutes Joint Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2015 3:52:24 PM
Creation date
4/14/2015 3:52:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
`�Ii1I1TES OF A J�INT i�IEETIi�IG I�fELD S�PT�1Il�ER 7 , 1972 Page ?. <br /> I Discussion follawed on the ��etro Sewer, �IETRO SEIVER <br /> primarily on t:ie route and cosi., The <br /> � concensus of opinion was tiiat =ahile ti�e <br /> � initial cost would be high, in the tinal <br /> analysis the cost of set��eriii� the Villa?e <br /> � ��oulcl be considerably lessened by iiaving <br /> t,ie i�ietro sewer. <br /> • <br /> • Searles reported on progress �ein� made by TRA:�l5PORTATION CO�ii�iITTEE <br /> • t:ie Trans�or�ation committee. Tlie committee RI:PORT <br /> �ias been meeting iaitii tIennepin County, <br /> � 'Tetro Traiisportation and applicable munici;�alities <br /> ;:o find alterna�es to County P,oad #15 so tiiat <br /> � it can remain a scenic route. Searles stated <br /> [Iennenin County estimates that the cost of <br /> study and �lanni�i�; would be between $50,000 <br /> and �75 ,000. The committee �,ras o£ tiie opinion <br /> +� t?iat involved communities should nay a s��all <br /> � fee for this seryice. Opiiei�n nosed the v�uestion <br /> ;•riiether t_iis planning was being done on the <br /> � need for aZternates , or assumiiig the obvious <br /> and ��laniiing for t}ie routes tliemselves. Searles <br /> a�reed oue of tiie alternatives tvoulcl be to <br /> _iire a consultant to consider clesi��ii.�ig a <br /> _ mini 494, ar another aiternative t:iat is <br /> favorable �o Orono's position. I!e also brou�iit <br /> out �.iat one of tiie reaso�is neTa i-ii,hway �12 <br /> ���as beiii� iield up was to finci out iviiat i�u,�act <br /> tizese studies :,�ould iiave on tiie traffic flo�v. <br /> � <br /> r Poisson said the PUD com��iittee was preceeding PAP.�: CO'i�Ii�1ISSI0N <br /> oii a PUll ordi�iance iaitii assistance fro� <br /> ilrauer F, Associates �a�io were donating tinie <br /> to tiiis stucly. Ogland listed some of t;ie <br /> • accomplishments of t�ie Fark Commission as <br /> � folloivs : <br /> � 1. iJeiv soft ball baE�:stop for tfaci:berry Park <br /> 2. An a�reement �ahereby the Village obtains <br /> use of tlie play�;rounc� eQuipment, tennis <br /> � court and area around tlie Old I-iill Sciiool in <br /> return for Village maintaining tlie �rounds <br /> • o�i t3ie entire comnlex. <br /> � 3. Obtained t?�e expertise of Jim Gilbert, <br /> � an authority or. r�ature trails and parl:s, <br /> to aid in tlie desi.gn and plans for Iligiii�oo�i <br /> � Par::. <br /> • Plans for tiie future include : <br /> ` 1. A sl;ating rinlc at Casco Park. <br /> r 2. Signs to identify our Parks usin� tiie <br /> standard Village of Orono sign wit:i a tacic-on. <br /> � <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.