Laserfiche WebLink
,. <br />, , , <br /> , ' • I i <br /> � ' <br /> i <br /> � � <br /> O CITY of OR NU <br /> . ; <br /> � <br /> � � RESOLUTION OF jH� �I� OUNCIL . <br /> L'�' NO.. 6 �) 1 � <br /> . � ��'kEsHO�'� , <br /> I <br /> A RESOLIlTIQN <br /> � �RANT�NG.VARI,�4M�CES FROM <br /> MUNICIPAL ZC}NING CC7DE <br /> II SEGTION 78-42U <br /> �I FILE NO. 14-3650 � : <br /> i <br /> �� WHEREb5, Donafd Davit4son and Jaanne Davidson, married couple i <br /> hereinafter "the Applicants") are the owners of ffie property fQcated at 56 FCeene Avenu� <br /> �ithin #he City bf �rono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as; Lo 6, 7 � 8, Block <br /> 6, Minnetonka Bluffs, �ogether with fihaf par� af the West half oi adjoini g vacated alfey <br /> f ing South of the Easferfy exfension ofi the Narth iine of said Lat 8, ennepin Caunty <br /> innesota (hereinafter the "Prope�ty"}; and I <br /> � WHEREAS, the ppplicants have made appiication to the Cit of 6rona for a <br /> ariance from Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78�420 to allow construc ion of an addition � <br /> ver an existing dec� on the existing home 41 feet ffom�the rear property lin . where a 50 foot <br /> s�tback is required; and 41 feet from the south side street property line where a 50 ioot setback <br /> i$ rec{uired; and <br /> WhE�R�AS, affer due pubfished notica and rr�ailed noti e in accordance <br /> ith Minnesota Statutes and the'Orono, h/finnesota, City Cade, a public heann was held by tFte <br /> rona Planning Commission on February 18, 201� at which tirnes ali perso s desiring to be <br /> h�arcf concsrning this applicatian were given the opportunity to speak thereon. <br /> RfaVtf, TH�REFORE BE iT RE5C7LVED by the City C uncil af Oronc�, <br /> N�innesota: I <br /> � FtNDlNGS I <br /> � <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning Fife number 14-3650. <br /> 2. The Pro.perty.is locatsd in thQ RR-1 B One Famiiy Rural R sidenfia! Zoning <br /> District which requires a minimum lot area of 2.Q acres and a inimum iat width <br /> of 200'. <br /> 3. Th� Planning Commission reviewed this appfication at a public hearing hefd on <br /> February 18, 2014 and voted 5 for and 0 against or� a motio to apprave the <br /> setback variances. Th� Planning Commission finds thai the ollowing factors <br /> support the granting of the requested variances: <br /> � . � Page 1 of 4 <br /> I <br />