Laserfiche WebLink
� �. <br /> � � <br /> � � <br /> O �, O "� <br /> CITY of ORO O <br /> a �► <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO NCIL <br /> ��9.k 3II�4��'G � NO. .�_ � � � � <br /> NE, Na�ural Environment and to Section 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C) (3) td permit a 9' <br /> encroacY�ment into the average lakeshore setback for structures where no en�roachment is <br /> allowed. <br /> D b the Ci Cou cil of Orono <br /> � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE y ty , <br /> Minnesoita: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2625. <br /> The property is located in the RR-1B One Family Lakesho e Residential <br /> � Zoning District. I <br /> The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on �Tovember 20, <br /> 2000 and recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0 for varian es based upon <br /> ', the following findings and hardships: � <br /> I <br /> A. The proposed pool would be located between the house nd gazebo on <br /> the lake side of the residence. The residence was 1 cated on the <br /> property prior to the 150' setback requirement for Lak Classen. <br /> B. The pool would be located above the hill and would be ell above the <br /> flood plain or areas affected by the OHWL of Lake Cl ssen. <br /> , C. Placing the pool behind the principal residence would no function well <br /> as it would be located in the front of the house towa ds the street. <br /> Typically, pools would be located behind the house i a back yard. <br /> Also, the street yard is the site of the septic system an alternate site, <br /> leaving no other reasonable location for the pool. <br /> D. The gazebo and dense vegetation would screen the poo from view to <br /> , adjacent residences. <br /> q�. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on thi� property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property iin this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variances would not adversely j affect traffic <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />