My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Engineers Report
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
Forest Arms Lane
>
805 Forest Arms Lane - 07-117-23-12-0009
>
Correspondence
>
Engineers Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:30:18 PM
Creation date
3/20/2017 9:59:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
805
Street Name
Forest Arms
Street Type
Lane
Address
805 Forest Arms La
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0711723120009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> C � N N fRS <br /> CRITERIUM-SCHIMNOWSKI ENGINEERS <br /> 161 DUNBAR WAY <br /> MAHTOMEDI,MN 55115 <br /> TEL 651779-7700 <br /> FAX 651779-7114 <br /> www.criterium-schimnowski.com <br /> August 17, 2016 <br /> Asher Judd <br /> Outdoor Innovations Landscaping <br /> 5885 165�'Street <br /> Hugo, MN 55038 <br /> RE: Boulder Retaining Wall Evaluation <br /> 805 Forest Arms Lane <br /> Orono, Minnesota <br /> Project#16-2367 <br /> Dear Mr. Judd: <br /> This letter is being sent per your request regarding the recently constructed boulder retaining walls at the <br /> above address. This evaluation is based on my observations during a site visit on August 4, 2016, and <br /> information you provided in an email on August 3, 2016, including as-built survey information and a <br /> sketch of a swimming pool post footing detail indicating that the pool footing loads are being supported <br /> below the influence of the retaining walls. <br /> The construction of the retaining walls is structurally stable and in general conformance with boulder <br /> retaining wall and construction industry standards.The walls were constructed with stone of sufficient size <br /> and setback. Other typical construction details such as use of drainage elements also appeared to be <br /> followed correctly.As is normal for boulder retaining walls of this type, some wall movement and soil <br /> settlement should be expected. I recommend that concentrated areas of surface water should be directed <br /> away from the walls. Several photos were taken for documentation, some of which have been provided <br /> as part of this report. <br /> This evaluation was performed using the design guidelines presented in the third edition of the"Design <br /> Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls"(DMSRVI� published by NCMA in 2009. Direct all surface <br /> drainage away from the retaining walls. If soil conditions, proposed layouts, or other design parameters <br /> vary from that assumed, a revised analysis might be needed. Please call me rf you have any questions or <br /> need more information. Thank you. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> r <br /> 1`�L����p�iSCl�1�f��t <br /> �,�a, � s , <br /> �; <br /> ,. �� • !s <br /> I _ ` , .. <br /> „ SE , '. :: <br /> ,,,.�....� <br /> Paul Schimnowski, PE ' � ���E€��- ; *,= <br /> ; �• 40120 *�*` <br /> . � <br /> �oa,�`•��. �,:��.,�e <br /> �i � •�-��••�•�,4 �e <br /> LICENSED J''����a!!N!�11��4�r`a <br /> PROFESSIONAL <br /> ENGINEERS <br /> HOME 8 BUILDING INSPECTIONS <br /> STRUCTURAL EVALUATIONS <br /> ASSOCIATION RESERVFJTRANSITION STUDIES <br /> RES I DENTIAUCOM MERCIAL <br /> RETAINING WALL DESIGN 8�EVALUATIONS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.