My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#4750-after the fact variances-2002
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
I
>
Ivy Place
>
3548 Ivy Place - 20-117-23-42-0017
>
Resolutions
>
#4750-after the fact variances-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:59:17 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 1:08:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3548
Street Name
Ivy
Street Type
Place
Address
3548 Ivy Place
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
2011723420017
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i�� <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> . CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ��� �G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �g� � NO. A=,�� <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C Zoning District,where 21,780 s.f. or.5 acre is <br /> the minimum required lot azea. The property consists of approximately 12,225 s.f. <br /> or.28 acres. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22,2002 and <br /> recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the following findings: <br /> A. Resolution#3183 approved 2,533 s.f.(20%)lot coverage by structures on the <br /> property. <br /> B. The deck is an equal replacement to what existed. The walkway is being <br /> repaired. <br /> C. The deck and walkway provide access from the second story of the residence <br /> to the lakeside of the property. <br /> D. The hardcover in the 0-75' setback area is increasing minimally(30 s.f.) to <br /> meet code standards. The removal of 177 s.f. of non-conforming landscape <br /> plastic in the 0-75' setback area is required in order for the site to meet city <br /> requirements. <br /> E. The deck and walkway have existed since at least 1992. ' <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; ttiat granting <br /> the vaziances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hazdship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br /> welfaze of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.