My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
re: lot line dispute
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
I
>
Ivy Place
>
3546 Ivy Place - 20-117-23-42-0018
>
Correspondence
>
re: lot line dispute
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:59:23 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 12:28:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3546
Street Name
Ivy
Street Type
Place
Address
3546 Ivy Place
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
2011723420018
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> Mary and Michael Drazan <br /> 3546 Ivy Place <br /> Orono, MN 55391 <br /> Melanie Curtis, Planning& Zoning Coordinator <br /> 2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> Orono, MN 55356 <br /> August 16, 2008 <br /> Melanie; <br /> This letter is to summarize the outcome of the meeting at our house yesterday, August <br /> 15�'. <br /> Let me first start with background. As part of our variance process we had a survey done <br /> by Acre Land Surveying through our builder, Charles Cudd. After the markers for our <br /> survey were set our neighbors to the north, the Pyles, were concerned because their <br /> survey did not match the markers on our shared lot line. To resolve the issue,we <br /> requested that our surveyors meet with the Pyle's surveyor, Mark Gronberg. Mr. <br /> Gronberg,met with our survey team and John Sonneck from Charles Cudd to determine <br /> which line was correct. At that time it was determined that the best survey to use was <br /> one from 1977 which had been done by Shoen and Mattson for Aurthur Jewett,the <br /> former owner of our property. It was determined as well that further properties to the <br /> north were also involved in the lot line issue. To resolve the issue we requested a <br /> meeting between the other neighbors to the north, the Pyles,the Dampiers and the <br /> Christensens, all surveyors involved, a Charles Cudd representative and ourselves. <br /> We were able to come to a resolution with the Pyles and Dampier's last night. Mrs. <br /> Christensen was able to attend but Mr. Christensen was out of town. Mrs. Christensen <br /> has requested that we meet with her husband when he is back in town Wednesday before <br /> she can agree to the proposed resolution. Understandably, Mrs. Christensen could not <br /> commit to any resolution without her husband reviewing the data as well. <br /> All parties have agreed that the Shoen and Mattson survey from 1977 is the most accurate <br /> survey to use for history in determining our property and the subsequent lot lines. We <br /> also agreed that the proposed lot lines for the neighbors will be adjusted. Our survey will <br /> stand as presented with our variance request. The Pyles and Dampiers are going to have <br /> new surveys done. Mr. Gronberg, their surveyor, has agreed to draft the new surveys for <br /> his customers from the markers sighted by our surveyors. Christensen's resolution will <br /> be determined after the meeting with Mr. Christensen. I have every confidence that the <br /> Christensens will also agree to the resolution once Mr. Christensen is able to review the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.