My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RE: 'ice house'/accessory structure/hardcover issues
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
I
>
Ivy Place
>
3532 Ivy Place - 20-117-23-42-0033
>
Misc
>
RE: 'ice house'/accessory structure/hardcover issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:59:36 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 12:59:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3532
Street Name
Ivy
Street Type
Place
Address
3532 Ivy Place
Document Type
Misc
PIN
2011723420033
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> MONDAY,JULY 9,2001 <br /> (#2636 Gary and Susan Cable, Continued) <br /> moveable. He stated the lot is wider at the lake, which reduces his buildable azea with all <br /> the required setbacks. <br /> Mayor Peterson asked if the 96 s.f. had always been calculated in the plans for the house. <br /> Weinberger stated that it was, and if the applicant had built closer to the road,he would <br /> have needed less driveway and would have been within the hardcover requirements. <br /> Nygard stated that the Planning Commission had made it clear to the applicant that he <br /> would have to chose between the third garage stall and the ice house. <br /> Rich Wysocki of 2770 Rainey Road asked if the hardship would be removing the structure <br /> and all its concrete from within the hillside so close to the lake. <br /> Jeanne Mabusth asked about saving the ice house for historical preservation. <br /> Sansevere asked if it was the job of the Council to find a hardship for the applicant. <br /> Nygazd stated that Council had helped other applicants in the same manner. <br /> Nygard stated that because the property was under the structural hardcover allowance, and <br /> building it closer to the road would have resulted in the destruction of large trees, he would <br /> be in favor of allowing the ice house to stay. <br /> Weinberger stated that the trees and topography were discussed at the planning stage and <br /> the house's current location was deemed the only proper place to situate the house. <br /> Barrett stated that finding hardship is a factual, not legal, finding. If the house is deemed <br /> an appropriate size, and the Council can't chose between the trees and the ice house,then it. <br /> is a valid hardship. The problem was with the variance being requested after-the-fact. <br /> Sansevere asked why the trees weren't recognized as the hardship during the planning <br /> phase. Cable stated that the process was dragged out because he had to keep revising the <br /> plans and it was costing him money. <br /> Flint stated that he had reviewed the minutes from the Planning Commission and they <br /> showed Mr. Cable had been told to chose between the ice house and the third garage stall. <br /> Therefore, he would not support the application. Mayor Peterson agreed. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.