Laserfiche WebLink
� �-' � �^ 1 `� i V l � i�✓ l �"� I" � V � l � l � 7 "� l �in�. f� ' � J� 1�„ ��� <br /> � <br /> ' � 1 L �S �~U1� I��p�In� � �5 � l� � � �� }2-�= � kCLU� <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> DATE: October 9, 1998 <br /> ITEM NO.: �� <br /> Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br /> Name Gregory A. Gappa Public Services <br /> Title Director of Public Services <br /> Item Description: Revised Assessment Roll Resolution for Shoreline/Heritage Sanitary Sewer <br /> Project- Resolution <br /> Construction is nearly complete on this project with sodding and paving of the final lift of <br /> bituminous pavement in 19991eft to be completed. Construction went very well for this project, <br /> with no unexpected problems, so the project costs are substantially lower than estimated. The <br /> original assessment roll,which was adopted at the June 29th assessment of$19,100 per unit. This <br /> was based on 20 properties being assessed for the project. <br /> There are two lots that were platted in the original subdivision that have been owned by an adjacent <br /> landowner outside the subdivision ever since the lots were platted. These were purchased to provide <br /> a buffer between the subdivision and the adjacent parcel. This subdivision was platted in the 1960's <br /> before the current zoning regulations were in effect, so all of the lots in the subdivision are non- <br /> confornung and are all appro�mately one acre in size. The original proposal was not to assess the <br /> two vacant non-conforming lots, so as to not imply any zoning or development rights for these lots. <br /> Also the property owner has no intention of selling or development these lots,at this time,and would <br /> have likely appealed the assessment. <br /> The assessment of these two vacant lots was questioned by one of the citizens at the assessment <br /> hearing. The Council indicated that based on the development of all of the other lots,the two vacant . <br /> lots would most likely be considered buildable in the future. Development of these lots with septic <br /> would be difficult,but with sanitary sewer available, it would be feasible to develop these lots. The <br /> Council directed staff to review the ability of these parcels,and to include them in the project for the ` <br /> calculation of the per-unit assessments if staff found that they would most likely be considered <br /> buildable. Staff is recommending these lots be included in the calculation of the per-unit <br /> assessments. This will lower the unit cost for a11 of the other properties in the project. The City will <br /> carry the costs for these lots until they are developed at which time the costs will be covered through <br /> a connection fee. ,,,� <br /> �,. <br /> Due to costs substantially lower than estimated, and based on the costs for project completion <br /> distributed over 22 parcels, versus the origina120 parcels, the per unit project assessment will be <br /> $15,500. The feasibility study assessment estimate was $19,100 per unit. <br />