Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> D�TAC�i1V�;�NT F�OM ORONO � <br /> ST��E�T�;RS S�'RING �'ARK �DDITIGTvr <br /> � <br /> t�obert Thurston asked th� Council wh�t pro�:rEss h�.ci b�cn <br /> made on a study of a petition submitted by hims�lf ana several <br /> other property own�rs in "treaters �;�rin� Park riddition requestin� <br /> detac�lm�nt of their properties from Orono in order that tney coul��, <br /> be annexed to the �illage of Spring P��,rk. Ttir. Thurston }�ointed <br /> out that �pring Park was goin�; ot install a municip�.l ��rater syste: : <br /> soon and the �roblems involved in m�,int�inin� tiie "Cur�r:.urlity t�at�;r <br /> Syst�m" now being used by the subj�ct lots after t'rle pro��er�;ies <br /> in "'1K�rin; Park also connc:cte� to the cor��murity .:�y;�tem dirconnect <br /> fror� it in fuv�r of t�ie mt�nicipal s��rvice. Franzel r:ioved to instruct <br /> the Villa,�;e :ittorney to dr ft �zny .re��ollztions or docuz�ents rec���z ,:�: �,. <br /> to cz�.rry out the request of the petition�;rs for con�>ideration 1_�; <br /> the council �,t an early d�:ite ; �nd furt��er tliat t�ae �tidi.iini�tr«tc � � <br /> explore tivitl� tlle S1�rin� Park of�'icials �:ny possibilitJr of an <br /> exc����nge of s�.riit���ry se;t�er se��vice �°✓itii S��ring P��rk to the benc � <br /> of both villages. <br /> �3UII,:�ITZG I'�I�T4�IT • <br /> Lot 13 , S�I:�DY`;`�OOi� :'�-J�ITIOT: <br /> �r. J.�.�`'�llenbur�; appear�d in su�p�rt of riis d�-y�lic��.tion for <br /> a buildin� per:r.it on the property krlo�vn as I;ot 13 c:nd -����.rt of Lot <br /> 12 , Uhady�vood �.ddition. �Ie explaine�l the fact th��t the pro��erty did <br /> lzot meet t�le minimun area rec�uirements f'or a buildin� site in �.ccord— <br /> �,nce with the �illage Code , but point�d out tl�at l�is predecessor <br /> in title , h�,.d divided �t���is lot in belief tilat a building perr.lit <br /> tr�ould be issued. ?ie revie�,aed tii� lon� ni;tory of contrcversy ��-- _>. <br /> the �uestion of ;�'_�leater or not t�iis v�<:�s �. build�tible lot, Und <br /> pointed out that tile se��°�er ��rould be soon coristructed so as tc- <br /> s�rve tl�is lot. IIe �,�ked tli;�t tiie �%ouncil c:xerciti;e t11e discr�. . <br /> p�rrnitted to it b;;r 32 .06G of th� Villa�;e �ode to allow construct— <br /> ion of a hor�e on tiiis lot, dnd he �.,�;reec� tliat tlle saicl r�or.ie �rould <br /> i�n;:�edizztely conriect�d to the se��aer sy.�tem �,s soon �;�s av:_�il�.ble. <br /> lh� �lerk re�..d r.�linutes of �. Pli�.r�nint� "omraission meetin�; held <br /> July 15 , 1963 rel�ting to th� matter. <br /> In tl,e -�iscussion cr��ich follo�ve�.z it v��s pointed out t1�at <br /> ��v�..ilability of se�ver could not justify �,bonder.ment of the princi— <br /> �les st�:;ted in Ch�pter 32 of the �illar;e Coa� , but that, ix� vie��r <br /> of th� histo.ry �.nd loc��tion of this lot , �,n exce�;tion rnig�lt be <br /> provided ti�at sewa�e co7lnection be ��rranged ju��;t �,s prornl�tly as � <br /> �ossible. <br /> :�uady �ioved thut a buildin�; perrnit be issu�d, but t::�G.t s��i�:' � <br /> buildin�, perrait specific��lly provide th:at th� property :�houla b�:� <br /> connected to tn.e �anitary ;�e�;�er �ystem, �vitYiin 60 d ys after s�-4icx � <br /> system �,r�.� �,va.ila.ble to the property, r�.nd thut the �illa�e be g�_v::ri, <br /> by the builc�in�; per�;lit, the right to go upon the prop�rty and m�,xe <br /> said connection to the seti�er system if the owner did not do so <br /> v�itl�in said 60 days ; this obligation would be a cYlarge upon the <br /> property, assess�.ble against it, regardless of own�;rs:_ip. lhe <br /> motion �R���s seconded by �ennett �-�nd c��,rried. <br /> • <br /> � <br />