Laserfiche WebLink
, 0� <br /> � <br /> Q O <br /> � :. � <br /> C ITY of ORONO <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> _ <br /> ���kE�I3�4�G .: ,NO. � � i� �ai .,: <br /> 4. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> held on September 20, 2004 and recommended approval of the variance to <br /> pennit the accessory building to be located closer to the street or front lot <br /> line than the principal residence, and denial of the side yard setback and <br /> oversized building request,based on the following findings: <br /> a. The constraints of the required wetland and septic setbacks. <br /> b. The street or front lot line of the property does not function as the front <br /> of the lot. <br /> c. The platted street right-of-way is currently undeveloped and isn't <br /> foreseeable to develop in the future. <br /> . d. The lot is secluded by wetlands to the west and railroad property to the <br /> north. <br /> � e. The lot is heavily wooded. <br /> f. A tree line exists to the east providing screening to the most affected <br /> neighbor. <br /> g. If a building 1,200 s.f. in size were constructed, the need for a north <br /> side yard setback variance could be eliminated. <br /> , h. Construction of a 2,160 s.f. building could create tlie appearance of a <br /> second principal residence and have the potential for unacceptable <br /> " uses is a residential zone, such as rental space and a home occupation. <br /> 5. The applicants revised their application prior to the October 11, 2004 City <br /> Council meeting to comply with the September 20, 2004 Planning <br /> Commission recommendation. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the revised proposal, consistent with the <br /> Planning Comrnission recornmendation is acceptable based on the finding <br /> noted above. <br />; Page 2 of 6 <br />