Laserfiche WebLink
r �� <br /> '' . <br /> SITE EV,?LliE.iICi�' REFCRT <br /> �OR CRA?G WINir�RS <br /> LoTs 1, 2, � 3 <br /> �-15-84 <br /> On Lot 2 i or the primar,y site of holes 1-4 the &VP.7'age <br /> percclation rate wds 1C�2 rr�inutes per inch with hole 1 bEir:g <br /> ver,y siok at 2!�(` rrlinutes per incri bri:iging uz� the average . <br /> This rate along wi.th � high water tsble would require d <br /> mound s,ystern. The alternate site, holes �-o, had an average <br /> x•�ercolation rate of 110 m,inutes per inch which would dlso <br /> reouire �. mound systerr�. Divers�on ch�nr�els or draintile <br /> should be used to divert �nd lower t ch <br /> of t� ' tes ' <br /> Lct 3 h�d an average percolation rate of 26. 6 mirnates <br /> per i_lch on trie prir:�ry site , holes 1-4, but becGuse of u <br /> pos�ible higri h;:�ter t�,ble ut 3. 0 feet s mound would be need- <br /> ed unless the wa�er table can be lowered. The altern�te site, <br /> noles 3-6, had a rate of ��.g minutes per inch which would <br /> allow a shallow trench s stem . <br /> e n a coup e ' • a <br /> percclation rates on the average slower th4n 120 minutes per <br /> inch wr,ich wouZd not allow even a mound systerr,. In additior., <br /> sor;e so�l borings were taken ne�.r the nortr lot line wr_cr <br /> h�,d a ;�er� hig'ti w�ter t�.ble . ihus, a� this ti��ie arl aaecu�te <br /> si�e W�= nct .faur�d but �� �s <br /> , �cssible tnzt sor.e are�;.s e���.st <br /> o� tr._s lct t:_�.t would s;�p�,ort �nourd s��rstems but o�ner €�rer.� <br /> �oulcl :.<<ve te be lookeci at in tne srrir�o. <br /> � � .;�.ncerely, <br /> � FFHCGR, IR'C. <br /> � � � <br /> a �iark S. Gror.b.�r�, F, , <br /> V <br /> ` . <br /> � �� <br /> ` _0 � � <br /> Y � <br /> � <br /> Q�, � <br /> V <br />