My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Wetland Classification/Identification/Delineation-2013
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
H
>
Hunt Farm Road
>
835 Hunt Farm Road - 30-118-23-43-0003
>
Misc
>
Wetland Classification/Identification/Delineation-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:28:08 PM
Creation date
2/28/2017 2:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
835
Street Name
Hunt Farm
Street Type
Road
Address
835 Hunt Farm Road
Document Type
Misc
PIN
3011823430003
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region <br /> ProjecUSite 835 Hunt Fartn Rd City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11/23/2013 <br /> ApplicanUOwner: Bob Angen State: MN Sampling Point: SP 2-1 Wet <br /> Investigator(s): DR,FJS >ection,Township,Range: T118N R23W S30/S31 <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): none <br /> Slope(%): 0.00°h Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83 <br /> Soil Map Unit Name Klossner soils,depressional,0 to 1 percent slopes JWI Classification: PEMC? <br /> Are GimatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology sign�cantly disturbedT Are"normal circumstances" <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) <br /> Hydrophytic vegetation presenY? Y <br /> Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area wkhin a wetland? Y <br /> Indicators of weUand hydrology present? Y `yes,optional weUand site ID: <br /> Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separete report.) <br /> NWI and parcel boundaries don't appear accurate in maps,they appear to overlap on the ground.NWI polygon does ot <br /> match wetland edge on aerial photo. <br /> VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species <br /> 1 Acersaccharum 20 Y FACU that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) <br /> 2 Quercus macrocarpa 5 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant <br /> 3 Species Across all Streta: 5 (B) <br /> 4 Percent of Dominant Species <br /> 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 80.00% (A/B) <br /> 25 =Total Cover <br /> Sa�lina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet <br /> 1 Comus racemosa 30 Y FAC Total�o Cover of: <br /> 2 Acersaccharum 5 N FACU OBL species 40 x 1= 40 <br /> 3 FACW species 60 x 2= 120 <br /> 4 FAC species 35 x 3= 105 <br /> g FACU species 25 x 4= 100 <br /> 35 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 <br /> Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 160 (A) 365 (B) <br /> 1 Phalaris arundinacea 50 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.28 <br /> 2 Carex sbicfa 30 Y OBL <br /> 3 Onoclea sensibilis 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> 4 Typha IatiPolia 10 N OBL Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation <br /> 5 X Dominance test is>50°h <br /> g X Prevalence index is 53.0' <br /> 7 Morphogical adaptations'(provide <br /> g supporting data in Remarka or on a <br /> g separete sheet) <br /> 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* <br /> 100 =Total Cover (explain) <br /> WoodY vine sVetum (Plot SIZe: 30' ) •Indicetors of hydric sal and wetland hydrolagy must be <br /> � present,unless distuibed or problematic <br /> 2 y rop ic <br /> 0 =Total Cover vegetation <br /> present? Y <br /> Remarks:(Indude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) <br /> US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.