My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Wetland Classification/Identification/Delineation-2013
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
H
>
Hunt Farm Road
>
835 Hunt Farm Road - 30-118-23-43-0003
>
Misc
>
Wetland Classification/Identification/Delineation-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:28:08 PM
Creation date
2/28/2017 2:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
835
Street Name
Hunt Farm
Street Type
Road
Address
835 Hunt Farm Road
Document Type
Misc
PIN
3011823430003
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region <br /> ProjecUSke 835 Hunt Fartn Rd City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 11/23/2013 <br /> ApplicanUOwner: Bob Angen State: MN Sampling Point: SP 1-1 Wet <br /> Investigator(s): DR,FJS >ection,Township,Range: T118N R23W S30/S31 <br /> Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): convex <br /> Slope(%): 5.00°k Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83 <br /> Soil Map Unit Name Hamel-Glencoe,depressional,complex,0 to 3 percent slopes JWI Class�cation: PF06Cd <br /> Are Gimatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"nortnal circumstances" <br /> Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) <br /> Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y <br /> Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y <br /> Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y `yes,optional weUand site ID: <br /> Remarks:(Explain altemative procedures here or in a separate report.) <br /> NWI and parcel boundaries don't appear accurate in maps,they appear to overlap on the ground.NWI polygon does ot <br /> line up with wetland on the imagery. <br /> VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute Dominan Indicator pominance Test Worksheet <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) °h Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species <br /> 1 Quercus rubra 10 Y FACU that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) <br /> 2 Quercus macrocarpa 10 Y FAC Tatal Number of Dominant <br /> 3 Acer negundo 10 Y FAC Specias Across all Svata: 5 (B) <br /> 4 Percent of Dominant Species <br /> 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 80.00% (AIB) <br /> 30 =Total Cover <br /> Saolina/Shrub sUaturt (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet <br /> 1 Rhamnus cathartica 30 Y FAC Total°k Cover of: <br /> Z OBL species 0 x 1= 0 <br /> 3 FACW species 100 x 2= 200 <br /> q FAC species 50 x 3= 150 <br /> 5 FACU species 10 x 4= 40 <br /> 30 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 <br /> Herb sVatum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 160 (A) 390 (B) <br /> 1 Phalans arundinacea 100 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.44 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> q Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation <br /> 5 X Dominance test is>50% <br /> g X Prevalence index is 53.0* <br /> 7 Morphogical adaptations'(provide <br /> 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a <br /> g separate sheet) <br /> 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation" <br /> 100 =Total Cover (explain) <br /> Woodv vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) •Indicators a nydric sai and wenand hydrolapy must ne <br /> � present,unless disturbed or problematic <br /> 2 y rop c <br /> 0 =Total Cover �e9�tion <br /> present? Y <br /> Remarks:(Indude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) <br /> US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.