Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 26, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 3 of 32 <br />(#07-3310 Ryan Companies US, Inc., 2765 Wayzata Boulevard West – Continued) <br /> <br />The site plan does call for relocating the existing access to Wayzata Boulevard to be located further east, <br />with the possibility of a shared driveway or shared access arrangement. The applicant has applied for <br />the permit to do this work because they have determined that it best to start with the renovation of the <br />existing building. Initially the applicant had proposed to paint the exterior of the building to match the <br />new building, which was approved by Council, but at the present time they are proposing to reface the <br />building and complete the parking lot work. Staff had initially recommended requiring a shared access <br />with Western Steel but the City Attorney advised the City lacked the authority to do that. MnDOT does <br />not want to issue the permit for the access and it was Staff’s belief that this would not be an issue until <br />the time the road was turned over to the County. At the present time the current access to the site is <br />available for use but it is possible that the entrance to the existing driveway will need to remain as is for <br />the time being. <br /> <br />Staff recommends at this point adoption of the resolution granting final plat approval, a motion to <br />authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Development Agreement as is or subject to minor <br />changes, and a motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the encroachment agreement. If <br />the Council would like to see major changes made to the Development Agreement, Staff would then <br />recommend the item be tabled to December 10th. <br /> <br />White expressed surprise that MnDOT was unaware there was not access from this lot to Old Crystal <br />Bay Road. <br /> <br />Turner stated part of the problem may be that the applicant was communicating more with the people <br />responsible for the right-of-way permit and that they may not have been aware of the access issue. <br />Turner commented that the access may need to remain where it is currently located. <br /> <br />Murphy stated there were substantial discussions regarding access and that it was his understanding all <br />parties had agreed there would be a shared driveway. Murphy stated there are a number of other issues <br />along the old Highway 12 corridor that also have not been resolved and that the properties along this <br />corridor at the present time are caught between the County and MnDOT. Hennepin County does not <br />favor a large number of full turning accesses into these properties along Highway 12 and that it is also <br />very doubtful that MnDOT will allow full access. Murphy stated he wants all parties to understand the <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 12/10/07 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/26/07 [Page 3 of 32]