My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-13-2007 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
08-13-2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2015 2:09:15 PM
Creation date
4/9/2015 2:57:47 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 23, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />(#07-3280 Vogue ICF Homes, Rest Point Circle, Continued) <br /> <br />On July 9th the Council tabled this application to allow further reduction of hardcover. The applicant has <br />submitted a revised plan that reduces hardcover for 1348 Rest Point from 28.76 percent to 28.08 and <br />reduces the hardcover for 1350 Rest Point from 29 percent to 28.33 percent. The applicant has also <br />indicated they will remove 438 square feet of hardcover from the 0-75 foot zone of 1350. <br /> <br />Turner noted the width of the sidewalk has been increased from three feet to four feet and that Staff <br />would like to see the sidewalk reduced back down to the three feet. <br /> <br />Turned noted the City has received a written request to extend the review period until the end of <br />September since the packet as published. <br /> <br />Rahn requested that in the future Staff separate these types of applications due to the difficulty in <br />following the proposals and revisions for each property. Rahn noted the hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone <br />shows zero and that there should be some type of number in there for the stairway. <br /> <br />Turner stated the applicant had indicated that he was going to remove all the hardcover in the 0-75 foot <br />zone, and as Staff looked at the application further, it was determined for 1350 the retaining walls should <br />not be removed. Turner stated the initial proposal was that the hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone would be <br />removed and a tram installed Turner stated the four-foot wide stairs are permitted in the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> <br />Rahn stated he would like to see a formal plan on what exactly will be built on the lot in each zone. <br /> <br />Turner stated the stairway down to the lake only requires a building permit. <br /> <br />Rahn commented he would still like to see a formal plan. Rahn asked if the driveway is an issue. <br /> <br />Turner stated the driveway is not an issue and that the applicant made a small reduction in the hardcover <br />by reducing the size of the deck. Staff feels there could be another slight reduction in the hardcover if the <br />width of the sidewalk is narrowed. Staff does not recommend reducing the setback but would consider <br />reorienting the garages. <br /> <br />Rahn stated he would not be in favor of locating the house closer to the road. <br /> <br />Vogstrom stated he would prefer not to have the 25-foot setback to the street but that he had considered <br />that option as a means of reducing the hardcover. <br /> <br />McMillan inquired what type of hardcover would be installed in the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> <br />Vogstrom stated there would be two lifts installed, one on each property, which would go down to the <br />lake. <br /> <br />Curtis stated they are allowed a maximum four-foot wide stair down to the lake and that generally some <br />type of stairway is incorporated with the lift. <br /> <br />McMillan inquired whether any type of dock would be installed. <br /> <br /> <br />PAGE 9 of 17 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 08/13/07 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07-23-07 [Page 9 of 17]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.