Laserfiche WebLink
� 4of9 <br /> Property address: 315 Hollander Rd, Orono, MN 55391 Inspector initials/Date: 7/27/2017�i� <br /> 4. SOII S2pdrdt1011—Compliance component#4 of 5 <br /> Date of installation: � Unknown Verification method(s): <br /> Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food Beverage � Yes ❑ No Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil <br /> Lodging? observations by two independent parties are sufficient, <br /> Com liance criteria: unless sife conditions have been altered or local <br /> requirements differ. <br /> For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and ❑Yes ❑ No <br /> not located in Shoreland or Wellhead � Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) <br /> Protection Area or not serving a food, ❑ Two previous verifications(Anach boring logs) <br /> beverage orlodging establishment: <br /> ❑ Not appliCable(Holding tank(s),no drainfield) <br /> Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify(See Comments/Explanation) <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. ❑ Other(See Comments/Explanation) <br /> Non-performance systems built April 1, �Yes ❑ No Comments/Explanation: <br /> 1996, or later or for non-performance <br /> systems locafed in Shoreland or Wellhead <br /> Protection Areas or serving a food, <br /> beverage, or lodging establishment: <br /> Drainfield has a three-foot vertical <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock.* <br /> "Experimental", "Other", or "Performance" ❑ Yes ❑ No Indicate de ths of elevations <br /> systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type IV <br /> or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. See Attached <br /> 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector A. Bottom of distribution media Borin Lo s <br /> License required) <br /> Drainfield meets the designed vertical B. Periodicall saturated soiubedrock <br /> separation distance from periodically C. S stem se aration <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. <br /> D. Re uired com liance se aration* <br /> Any "no"answer above indicates the system is •May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local <br /> Failing to Protect Groundwater. ordinance. <br /> 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*—compiiance comPonent#5 of s � Not applicable <br /> Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes � No If"yes",A below is required <br /> Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes � No If"yes", B below is required <br /> BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design <br /> If the answer to both quesfions is "no", this section does not need to be completed. <br /> Com liance criteria <br /> a. Operating Permit number: <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No <br /> Have the O eratin Permit re uirements been met? <br /> b. Is the re uired nitro en BMP in lace and ro erl functionin ? ❑Yes ❑ No <br /> Any "no"answer indicates Noncompliance. <br /> Upgrade Requirements(Minn.Stat.§ 115.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(ITPHS)must be upgraded,replaced,or its use <br /> discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorfer period if required by local ordinance.If the system is failing to protect <br /> ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.lf an existing system <br /> is not failing as defined in law,and has at least two feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,replaced,or <br /> its use discontinued,notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, <br /> Wellhead Protection Areas,or those used in connection with food,beverage,and lodging establishments as de£ned in law. <br /> www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657•3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats <br /> wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Page 3 of 3 <br />