My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/15/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
10/15/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2018 3:05:42 PM
Creation date
4/9/2015 2:36:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 15, 2012 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 5 <br /> <br />and establishment of 35-foot wetland buffers and buffer setbacks will be triggered for lots containing <br />wetlands. <br /> <br />The original home and a bridge over the drainage creek exists on Lot 3. There is also a barn on Lot 4 that <br />is proposed to be removed. The existing driveway will be abandoned and an outlot will be platted west of <br />the driveway which will serve as the private road/cul-de-sac. A stormwater pond is proposed to be <br />created straddling Lot 1 and Lot 2 to address new stormwater from the new hardcover. <br /> <br />The property has an area of existing woods along County Road 6 and the eastern property line. In <br />addition, there is a large wetland with an open view shed over the wetlands from County Road 6. A <br />Conservation Design report has been submitted by the applicant, which indicates the trees along the <br />creek, the north property line, and County Road 6 should be preserved. The applicant should provide <br />conservation easements for protection of the trees for the road noise, sound buffering, screening, and <br />erosion protection purposes. <br /> <br />An access permit is required from Hennepin County in order to relocate the property access and create a <br />new private road. The City will require standard perimeter, drainage, and utility easements around all <br />property boundaries as well as Conservation and Flowage easements over the delineated wetlands and <br />wetland buffers. Tree conservation easements should be provided to protect the trees. <br /> <br />At the sketch plan review, the Planning Commission recommended the applicant dedicate a trail easement <br />along the north side of County Road 6 as part of the plat. The plat is subject to the standard park fee and <br />stormwater drainage trunk fee. The property is not located within the MUSA and the lots are proposed to <br />be served by septic systems and private wells. Septic system designs have been submitted to the City and <br />have by approved by the septic inspector. <br /> <br />The developer has prepared a Conservation Design report that identifies areas where trees and positive <br />views should be preserved. The plan also outlines invasive, nonnative species to be removed. The report <br />indicates the developer should either preserve the existing pine stand along the old driveway or remove <br />the trees and establish an area of turf. Staff would propose a different option, which would be a <br />modification of option one and create less disturbance. Staff would suggest the developer preserve the <br />existing pine trees, leave most of the wheel strip driveway as is but remove the driveway curb cut at <br />County Road 6 and restore the ditch area. This option would make the wheel strip driveway “invisible” <br />from County Road 6 and preserve the stand of trees. The developer could do a similar treatment to the <br />north end of the driveway where Lots 3 and 4 meet. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat to create four buildable lots. The City Engineer has <br />reviewed the preliminary plat application materials and his comments have been included in the packet. <br />The developer should prepare a final plat application that responds to and incorporates the <br />recommendations of the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit requested the photos of the site be displayed on the overhead. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked whether Staff’s recommendations include the review conducted by Bolton & Menk. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the City Engineer’s recommendations are essentially standards that the development needs <br />to be held to and address drainage calculations, road design, easements and conservation design <br />requirements.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.