My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-29-2007 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
05-29-2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2015 2:16:54 PM
Creation date
4/9/2015 2:13:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 14, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 17 <br /> <br /> <br />*12. #07-3272 KERN HOPPE, 1150 WYNDMERE ROAD, PRELIMINARY PLAT – <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5614 <br /> <br />McMillan moved, Rahn seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5614, a Resolution Granting <br />Preliminary Plat Approval. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />13. #07-3277 SUSAN NELSON, 500 OXFORD ROAD – VARIANCE <br /> <br />Susan Nelson, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Turner stated the applicant is requesting setback variances to construct two additions to the rear of her <br />house, one with a 46.4 foot setback and one with a 44.7 foot setback. A 50-foot setback from the rear <br />property line is required in both situations. <br /> <br />The applicant presented a revised proposal to the Planning Commission. The addition was smaller and <br />divided into two additions. The addition behind the garage would provide for a mudroom, laundry area, <br />and storage area for outdoor items. The master bath would be expanded into existing laundry/mudroom <br />and storage closet. At its closest point this addition would be 46.4 feet from the rear property line. The <br />addition behind the other end of the house would provide for a larger informal dining area. At its closest <br />point it would be 44.7 feet from the rear property line. <br /> <br />At its April meeting the Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend approval of the revised <br />proposal, and the dissenting Commissioner felt there were other options available. <br /> <br />Turner noted the applicant has submitted some further revisions today and that the storage addition <br />behind the garage complies with the setback. Staff has some reservations regarding the size of the dining <br />room addition and whether the six-foot setback encroachment is justified. <br /> <br />Nelson stated the storage addition is for her husband’s tools. Nelson stated at the time the structure was <br />originally constructed, the house was built even with the street. Nelson indicated the addition is proposed <br />in its present location to prevent water problems. <br /> <br />Rahn inquired whether any thought has been given to relocating the whole addition or not extending it as <br />far out to make it more compliant. <br /> <br />Nelson stated they are basically following the deck and that the dining room accesses off of the kitchen. <br />There is also an existing stairway in the interior of the house that prevents the addition from being <br />relocated. <br /> <br />Rahn stated in his view the dining room addition does not need to extend as far out as it does. Rahn noted <br />this is a two-acre parcel that is currently conforming and that in his view there should be some revisions <br />to the plan. Rahn inquired whether the applicant’s builder was aware that the plans encroached into the <br />setback. <br /> <br />Nelson stated he is. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/29/07 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/14/07 [Page 17 of 27]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.