Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 14, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 8 <br /> <br />7. #07-3250 PHILLIP CARLSON, 2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD – FINAL PLAT – <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5613 <br /> <br />Phillip and Gina Carlson, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting general development plan, final plat and easement vacation <br />approval. The City has received the applicants’ letter of credit and other required submittals. The City <br />Engineer has approved the plans. <br /> <br />Gaffron recommended the City Council adopt the proposed resolution and give authorization for the <br />Mayor and Clerk to execute the PUD No. 2C agreement and development contract, and the HRA chair <br />and executive director to execute the Cross Access Easement Agreement. <br /> <br />Murphy inquired whether the movement of the dirt being hauled off the site would be an issue. Murphy <br />noted that issue was raised by former Mayor Edward Callahan. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the development agreement does not allow construction traffic through the senior housing <br />site and that the hauling route has been spelled out in the agreement. <br /> <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5613, a Resolution Granting <br />General Development Plan Approval for Planned Unit Development No. 2C for Amber Woods <br />Offie Centre, LLC, and Approving the Final Plat of Amber Woods Office Centre and Vacating <br />Existing Drainage and Utility Easements – File #07-3250. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />McMillan moved, Bremer seconded, to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute the PUD No. 2C <br />Agreement and Development Contract. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8. #07-3251 MANDEEP & LEISA SODHI, 4080 DAHL ROAD – VARIANCES <br /> <br />Mandeep and Leisa Sodhi, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />Turner stated the applicants are requesting a setback variance to allow the existing deck to remain as <br />constructed with a 0.76 foot setback from the side property line when a ten foot setback is required, to <br />have the existing patio remain as constructed with a 1.7 foot setback from the side property line when a <br />two-foot setback is required, and to have 27 plus percent hardcover in the 75-250 foot zone when the <br />maximum is 25 percent. <br /> <br />Turner stated the Planning Commission reviewed this matter in February and made no recommendation <br />regarding the hardcover variance because hardcover calculations were not available for the property <br />before the deck was reconstructed. City files contained a survey from 2001 that showed the hardcover on <br />the site. Consideration of this application was delayed while the Applicant’s surveyor completed <br />hardcover calculations based on this survey. Turner noted the calculations received do not properly <br />classify landscape beds underlain by weed control fabric as hardcover. <br /> <br />Staff recommends the Council consider the changes in hardcover made in conjunction with the deck <br />reconstruction separately from the issue of the fabric under the landscape planting beds. While the <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/29/07 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/14/07 [Page 8 of 27]