Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 26, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 9 <br /> <br />(Kennel License – Runkle, Continued) <br />operate any kennel for business or commercial purposes, including sale, boarding, breeding, grooming, <br />training or medical care without a valid commercial kennel license. <br />Murphy stated in his opinion the Runkles are not in the commercial business of raising and selling dogs <br />but that this may require a commercial kennel license, which is not allowed in a residential area. <br />Murphy stated it appears the Runkles are boarding, breeding, and grooming the dogs on the property but <br />are not selling them. <br />White noted a residential kennel license is required for one to two dogs. <br />McMillan stated a commercial kennel license is required when there are more than three dogs. <br />Mrs. Runkle stated there are other people within the City who have more than two dogs. <br />City Attorney Brokl stated there is a separate section in the City’s Code, Section 62-183, Residential <br />Kennel License Standards and Requirements, which states that a kennel license can be issued in a <br />residential area for two or more animals. Brokl stated a commercial kennel license would deal more with <br />the keeping and boarding of other people’s dogs and that a residential kennel license would apply more <br />in this case since the dogs are all owned by the same person. <br />Murphy inquired whether a commercial kennel license would then be for the boarding of someone else’s <br />dogs. <br />Brokl stated that is part of it, and that the language for a commercial kennel license also says, containing <br />kennel structures, enclosed buildings sufficient to operate the business, whereas the residential license <br />says that it should not adversely affect neighboring persons or property. Brokl stated the nature of the <br />kennel is more residential or rural in nature in this situation. <br />McMillan stated the last sentence states, nothing in this chapter shall preclude the breeding of licensed <br />dogs kept at a residential kennel or the sale of offspring, the occasional sale of licensed dogs or private <br />grooming or training. <br />Murphy stated he has a concern that a complaint letter to the City is not allowed to be made public and <br />that the people who are being complained about are at a disadvantage. Murphy stated it appears the <br />people who have complained are not in attendance at tonight’s meeting. <br />Bremer noted she also resides on Casco Point and that she currently owns two dogs. Bremer stated one <br />of the reasons she did relocate is because her previous neighbor did not like dogs. Bremer stated from <br />the complaining neighbor’s perspective, it probably is bothersome, but that she has personally gone past <br />the Runkles’ property numerous times and that she does not see the Runkels as being irresponsible dog <br />owners. Bremer stated in her mind the win/win situation is a maximum of seven dogs on this property <br />with the current structure. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 03-12-07 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02-26-07 [Page 9 of 11]