My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-2007 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
02-26-2007 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2015 1:25:47 PM
Creation date
4/9/2015 1:23:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 12, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />(4. #06-3231 WILLIAM S. DAMPIER, 3550 IVY PLACE, Continued) <br /> <br />White stated the applicant’s timeline matches with Lyle Oman’s timeline and that the issue appears to be <br />the bump-out. White noted the building inspector states the plans did show a bump-out but that he was <br />under a heavy work load and did not get back to the plans until August. <br /> <br />Dampier stated it was his intent to remain at 40 percent hardcover. Dampier stated Planner Bottenberg <br />was adamant that a one and a half story had to remain a one and a half story and that he could not go <br />above what existed. <br /> <br />Murphy asked the applicant what he feels is the issue today. <br /> <br />Dampier stated the issue is whether he can add an additional 114 square feet for the bump-out and to <br />maintain an existing cantilevered 23 inch by 30.2 foot lakeward extension. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the plans have been revised from 9 feet to 8.5 feet in order to meet the setback. <br /> <br />Murphy asked if the total area would be 127 square feet. <br /> <br />Turner stated the bow is 114 square feet and is illustrated on Exhibit F. <br /> <br />White inquired whether the 23 inches was an oversight. <br /> <br />Dampier stated in 2005, he depicted that area as beyond the foundation along with the bump-out, but by <br />mid July he was told he could not construct the bump-out. <br /> <br />Murphy asked where the cantilever is located. <br /> <br />Dampier stated the first floor is 18 inches out and the second floor is 8 inches out. <br /> <br />Gaffron illustrated the existing portions of the house and the area that the applicant is proposing to <br />construct. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view the bump-out was never really a part of the original plans and that it was <br />added on in 2005 during the construction. McMillan stated she would be okay with allowing the existing <br />cantilevered area and reconstructing the nonstructural deck. McMillan stated she does not see a <br />justification for the bump-out. <br /> <br />Dampier stated his great room overlooks two garages and a driveway and that it was constructed in that <br />manner because he was ordered to construct it as a one-story. Dampier stated that area consists of 700 <br />square feet and that he is only left with a small area that can be utilized as bedroom space. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the great room is really not part of what is being discussed tonight and that she <br />understands the construction of the great room does not allow much room for bedrooms and other living <br />space. <br /> <br />Dampier stated even with the bump-out, he would have less structural coverage than both of his neighbors <br />and that he is willing to trade his deck for the bump-out. Dampier stated the 2000 permit allows him to <br />build a 480 square foot deck. <br /> <br />PAGE 4 of 14 <br />Item #04 - CC Agenda 02/26/07 <br />Approval of Meeting Minutes February 12, 2007 [Page 4 of 14]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.