Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />PAGE 4 of 8 <br />(6. #09-3428 MICHAEL AND MARILYN HUTHWAITE, 3382 BAYSIDE ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />Steiner indicated the Huthwaites have spent a considerable amount of time with Staff and the Planning <br />Commission to design a set of plans that meet as many of the City’s concerns as possible. Steiner <br />requested the City Council approve the Huthwaite’s application subject to Staff’s recommendations. <br /> <br />McMillan asked what percentage of trees would be removed. <br /> <br />Steiner indicated it is the Huthwaite’s desire to leave as many trees as possible. <br /> <br />Hendel stated their plan is to remove only the diseased trees. <br /> <br />McMillan inquired whether they have discussed this project with the Minnehaha Watershed District. <br /> <br />Hendel indicated they have and that they are awaiting the City’s approval of the project. <br /> <br />Murphy stated restoration of the creek is probably the most important aspect of this application and that <br />he is totally supportive of that portion of the project. Murphy indicated he does not have any issue with <br />the bridge. <br /> <br />Steiner noted the bridge would help them access the southern portion of their lot. <br /> <br />Murphy expressed concerns that the new residence may be a little out of character for the neighborhood. <br />Murphy noted a number of the homes in the neighborhood are either being rented or for sale and that <br />given the current state of the economy, it is likely that neighborhood will remain in that state for a number <br />of years. <br /> <br />Steiner stated the flip side of that argument is that if this project does not go forward, the property will <br />remain undeveloped. <br /> <br />Bremer stated the home is more in keeping with the Oxford neighborhood, which is located across <br />Bayview Road. Bremer commented the home could raise a massing issue given its size on a small lot. <br /> <br />McMillan stated in her view the proposed size of the house on this small lot should be taken into <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Franchot indicated he is comfortable with the plans and that it is a reasonable use of the lot in his opinion. <br />The reclamation around the creek is an added bonus. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she appreciates the revisions made by the Applicant but that she has a concern given the <br />close setback to the neighboring property to the north. <br /> <br />Steiner noted there are a number of similar setbacks in the area. <br /> <br />McMillan concurred that there are a number of similar setbacks throughout the neighborhood. McMillan <br />expressed concern that the creek reclamation project will require a considerable amount of maintenance. <br /> <br />Steiner noted the Huthwaites are required to sign a maintenance agreement. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 12/14/09 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/23/09