Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 27, 2008 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br />(PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued) <br /> <br />amount of money on their application. After their variance was approved, they received from the City a <br />charge of $1800, which they were unaware they would incur. Feyo indicated they had an understanding <br />that Orono has a contract with Bonestroo, who was doing the consulting work, and that the City’s <br />engineer would have the final say. <br /> <br />Feyo stated she spoke with Ron Moorse and asked whether everybody gets charged this extra fee. She <br />was told it is not charged on a regular basis. Feyo indicated she then asked why they were not told <br />about the charge upfront. Feyo stated they had three previous surveys, with two of the surveyors <br />indicating that a new survey was not necessary since nothing had changed on the lot, but yet they were <br />told the City required another survey. Feyo stated they did go ahead and obtain another survey. She <br />then contacted Bonestroo and asked why they were not informed of this additional charge upfront and <br />was told that Bonestroo’s accounting system was in disarray and they were not aware of the charge. <br />Later someone at City Hall informed them that the City of Orono’s books were in disarray and were not <br />aware that they should be charged. <br /> <br />Feyo commented in her view it was a miscommunication and that the charge should be dropped. <br /> <br />Feyo stated she was initially told by Planner Turner that the City Engineer determines whether the <br />charge would apply but she was later told by City Engineer Kellogg that the decision to charge the fee <br />was made by Planner Turner. <br /> <br />Rahn stated the City would certainly be willing to look into this issue further and get back to Mrs. Feyo. <br /> <br />Bremer stated generally there are some engineering costs that are included in the application fee but that <br />once a certain amount is reached, there may be additional charges assessed and the charge is dependent <br />on the amount of engineering services required. <br /> <br />Feyo indicated she can appreciate that but that they had very little control over the situation. Feyo <br />stated they do not feel the charge was fair and requested the council look into the matter. <br /> <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> <br /> <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br /> <br />4. #03-3351 BARRY TANNER ON BEHALF OF BROOK INVESTMENT, B-1 ZONING <br />DISTRICT – ZONING CODE AMENDMENT <br /> <br />Barry Tanner, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Turner stated the applicant is requesting the B-1 retail sales business district regulations be amended to <br />allow bowling centers as conditional uses. The Council had requested that the Planning Commission <br />develop conditions and criteria for commercial regulation uses. The Planning Commission discussed <br />the topic at its May 7th work session and developed some criteria. The criteria were approved by the <br />Planning Commission at their May 19th meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />PAGE 5 of 12 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 06/09/08 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/27/08 [Page 5 of 12]