My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-2009 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
09-28-2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:10:59 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 2:11:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 14, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br /> <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br />(6. #09-3427 ALONZO AND RENEE SERAN, 4099 HIGHWOOD ROAD – PUBLIC HEARING, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />Seran asked whether he would be able to obtain his building permit even if the neighbor does not sign the <br />agreement. Seran noted the neighbor did not adhere to his approved grading and drainage plan and that <br />he does not understand why it is now their responsibility to convince the neighbor to sign the agreement. <br /> <br />Mattick noted the Serans are the ones requesting the change from the approved plan by requesting a <br />5-foot easement rather than a 10-foot easement. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the plan that was submitted by the Serans’ attorney depicts the swale located on both <br />properties and that the original survey depicted the swale totally on the Serans’ property. <br /> <br />Mr. Seran asked what he is required to do to obtain a building permit. <br /> <br />Mattick stated if the Serans are able to construct a 5-foot swale located entirely on their property that is <br />approved by the City Engineer, they are free to do that. The neighbor expressed a concern about a pipe <br />going in the swale and he was assured that there would be no pipe and that the swale would be grass <br />rather than gravel. Mattick noted the neighbor did not indicate he would sign the easement. <br /> <br />Mayor White closed the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. <br /> <br />Bremer moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5862, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-330, 78-1288 and 1404 and Revising Resolution <br />No. 3537, subject to the easement being signed by the Serans and a letter in favor of the work being <br />signed by the adjoining property owner. <br /> <br />Mr. Seran asked whether any changes are required to the easement document. <br /> <br />Mattick indicated there are not. <br /> <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Murphy Opposed. <br /> <br />7. JOHN BROOKS, 905 FERNDALE ROAD WEST – FENCE IN RIGHT-OF-WAY <br /> <br />John Brooks, Applicant, was present, along with Bob Near, Architect. <br /> <br />Curtis stated at the property located at 905 Ferndale Road West there is a 4-foot split rail fence located in <br />the right-of-way along the property approximately four feet off of the paved surface of Ferndale Road. <br />The property owners wish to replace the existing fence with an 8 feet high fence located 10 feet off of the <br />paved surface of the road still in the right-of-way. The proposed fence would consist of steel fence posts <br />located every 8 feet and 11 concrete/stone pillars located at strategic points along the fence. <br /> <br />The existing wooden fence could be reconstructed in-kind in its current location under state statute. The <br />property owner, however, would like to improve on the setback of the fence with the new fence and <br />increase the height of the fence from 4 feet to 8 feet. Using a more permanent monument and fence post <br />is inconsistent with an in-kind construction and poses considerably more liability than an all wooden <br />structure. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 09/28/09 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/14/09 [Page 4 of 8]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.