My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-2008 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2008
>
03-10-2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 2:15:07 PM
Creation date
4/8/2015 2:09:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 25, 2008 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />(5. #08-3344 CITY OF ORONO, BIG ISLAND PARK PROPERTY, Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated the City Council can direct Staff to prepare an approval resolution and that all the <br />requirements of the City have been met. <br /> <br />Bremer noted she was in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting and that in her view she felt <br />the Planning Commission had a good discussion regarding the application and that there was some <br />concern expressed about the impact that four docks would have the island. Bremer stated it was not <br />clear from the information given to the Planning Commission that they were not to review the number <br />of docks and that the Planning Commission also received comment from Mike Gaffron to the effect that <br />“I think it is a good idea to approve half and then get the second public hearing before allowing others to <br />be built.” Bremer stated in her view the Planning Commission relies on Staff to focus them on the <br />issues involved in an application. <br /> <br />Bremer suggested a joint meeting with the City Council and the Big Island Committee would be <br />beneficial and recommended that a representative from the Planning Commission be invited to attend. <br />In essence, the Planning Commission relies on the direction of staff to know what issues need to be <br />discussed and reviewed and that in her view the Commissioners asked a number of good questions. <br />Bremer noted that whenever the City is the applicant, the City Council has already reviewed the work <br />and given the go-ahead to Staff to file an application. <br /> <br />Kempf stated the situation was rather unusual since it was coming from the City and that it was his <br />understanding the issues were up for discussion. Kempf stated it appeared to him that the application <br />was submitted kind of on the fly given the lack of survey information and that the Planning Commission <br />felt they did not have enough information to be assured that the proposed work would not negatively <br />impact the island. <br /> <br />Kempf commented he would like to see the Minnehaha dock at Big Island but that the Planning <br />Commission had concerns and uncertainty about what the future use of the island was going to be and <br />the impact that four docks would have on the island. Kempf noted the resident in attendance at the <br />meeting raised concerns regarding the wake from large boats and erosion and that he personally still <br />questions the need for four 100 foot docks with concrete pads on Big Island and the impression that it <br />would give as the entrance place to the island. <br /> <br />Murphy stated information needs to be transmitted better from the committee to staff and then to the <br />Planning Commission. Murphy noted that there are issues dealing with timing of the work that have <br />been discussed thoroughly by the committee and that the work needs to be completed in the very near <br />future to avoid additional costs. <br /> <br />Jabbour stated the Planning Commission does not have the authority to limit the number of docks and <br />that the LMCD regulates the number of docks. Jabbour recommended the hierarchy of the different <br />organizations be explained to the Planning Commission. Jabbour asked whether the only issue that was <br />for review by the Planning Commission was the construction of the concrete pads. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it was clear from Staff’s memo that the variances had to do with the concrete pads. The <br />docks became a factor in determining how much hardcover was appropriate. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PAGE 7 of 12 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 03/10/08 <br />Approval of Coucil Minutes 02/25/08 [Page 7 of 12]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.