My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2008 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2008
>
02-25-2008 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 2:08:43 PM
Creation date
4/8/2015 2:05:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 11, 2008 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br />(5. #07-3329 DAVID W. BERG ON BEHALF OF WARREN AND JERNICE BERG, 3669 <br />NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br /> <br />Berg stated he also was just told on Friday that the plastic and rock would have to be removed prior to <br />the framing inspection. Berg stated given the cold weather, the rock would be very difficult to remove. <br /> <br />Curtis noted a certificate of occupancy is not issued for a second story and that the framing inspection is <br />the only time that the inspector could stop the project if the plastic and rock is not removed or other <br />conditions are not complied with. <br /> <br />Berg indicated the resolution is a legal document and that he would be removing the rock. <br /> <br />Rahn asked whether there would be any funds kept in escrow on this project. <br /> <br />Curtis stated there would not be. <br /> <br />Rahn noted the City is not always called for a final inspection and that the City wants to verify that the <br />requested work is completed prior to the project being finished. <br /> <br />Rahn noted the 0-75 foot zone and the 75-250 foot zone have reductions in hardcover from what <br />currently exists. <br /> <br />Bremer asked whether the deck is existing. <br /> <br />Berg stated it is. <br /> <br />White commented the deck could be reduced to help reduce the structural coverage. <br /> <br />Berg indicated the deck would not count as structural coverage given its height. <br /> <br />Bremer noted with the removal of the shed, the overage on the structural coverage would be 41 feet. <br /> <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5722, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances for the Property Located at 3669 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, <br />McMillan Opposed. <br /> <br />McMillan indicated she is opposed to the increase in structural coverage. <br /> <br />6. #08-3338 THOMAS AND KATHERINE ZIEGLER, 2264 SHADYWOOD ROAD – <br />VARIANCES AND DRIVEWAY APPROACH WIDTH <br /> <br />Thomas and Katherine Ziegler, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />Turner stated the Zieglers are proposing to reconstruct the existing house under a code provision that <br />allows them to reconstruct a structure without meeting the zoning code requirement except for the <br />floodplain. Turner noted the basement would be eliminated and it would be slab on grade. The <br />applicants are requesting a setback variance to construct an attached garage with an 11.2 foot setback <br />from the right-of-way of Crystal Bay Road when a 15-foot setback is required. In addition, the <br />applicants are requesting a setback variance to add an open porch with a 5-foot setback from the right- <br /> <br />PAGE 7 of 12 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 02/25/08 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 2/11/08 [Page 7 of 12]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.