Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 3 <br /> <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br /> <br />*4. #09-3410 JACK W. SAFAR, 980 FERNDALE ROAD WEST – VARIANCE – <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5850 <br /> <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5850, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-1279, 78-1288, 78-1608(3)(c), for the Property <br />Located at 980 Ferndale Road West. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />*5. #09-3412 CORTNEY SCOTT LeNEAVE ON BEHALF OF CORTNEY WAYNE <br />LeNEAVE, 360 WAKEFIELD ROAD – SUBDIVISION – SKETCH PLAN <br /> <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to table Application #09-3412, Cortney Scott LeNeave on behalf <br />of Cortney Wayne LeNeave, 360 Wakefield Road, to the July 27, 2009, City Council meeting at the <br />request of the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />6. APPEAL OF ZONING VIOLATION - 4450 SPRUCE WAY <br /> <br />Curtis stated Staff did a drive-by inspection of the property located at 4450 Spruce Way following a <br />complaint to the City. The property inspection confirmed that two Express Delivery trucks were parked <br />at the residence and the word “Express” was printed on their address marker sign. <br /> <br />A letter was sent to the property owner with notification that commercial use of residential property is <br />governed by City Code 78-1376 regarding home occupations. The office of the business may be housed <br />within their residence but the remaining business activity is not permitted. While the property does not <br />fully meet the definition of a dispatch center as listed within 78-1376, Staff feels this business falls under <br />the category of prohibited home occupations since the traffic level it potentially generates is similar to a <br />dispatch center. Mr. Frazier is appealing staff’s interpretation of the home occupation. <br /> <br />Curtis stated in cases where it is unclear whether a home occupation should be classed as a Level 1 or <br />Level 2, the zoning administrator shall make the determination, which is then subject to City Council <br />confirmation if requested by the operator of the home occupation. In this instance, it is unclear whether <br />the homeowner is operating a Level 2 business, but it is Staff’s opinion the homeowner is operating a <br />home business that does not qualify as either a Level 1 or a Level 2. <br /> <br />Council is asked to review the information provided and make a determination whether the business <br />qualifies as a Level I or II or should be prohibited. <br /> <br />Curtis stated she does have photographs available for review. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 07/27/09 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07/13/09 <br />[Page 3 of 12]