Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
, . <br /> � O ' V <br /> O O <br /> ���. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �� G'�' RESOLUTION OF TH T COUNCI L <br /> �`9I�'E p4�'�' NO. � � � � <br /> SH <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B, Single Famil}� Lakeshore F.esidential <br /> Zoning District, requirin� 1 acre in area and 140' of lot «�idth. <br /> 3. The Orono Plannin.g Commission reviewed this application on January 16, 1996 <br /> and further reviewed revisions to the application on Apr�' 15, 1996 and <br /> recommended approval of the praposed variances based upon the followin� <br /> findings: <br /> A. The property currently contains a small 600 s.f. house and no garage, yet <br /> the property already exceeds the 25°/o 7�-250' hardcover limtt due to the <br /> eatremel�� small lot area and narrowness of the lot. <br /> B. T'he proposed house and attached two car gara�e «-ill cornprise of 1,492 <br /> s.f. of structural footprint on the property, m�eti.:� the 1,500 s.f. <br /> limitation far lot coverage on extremel�� small lots establisl-�.ed in zoning <br /> code Section 10.03, Subdivision 14 (C). <br /> C. 'I�ne proposed house is located less than the normal 30' required setback <br /> fram HiQ'�w�od Roaei in order to rninimize the a?no�int of har�cover <br /> needed for driveway. The proposed 40% hardcover in the 75-2�0' zone <br /> is not dissimilar fram the hardcover percentages on other properties iii <br /> the neighborhood. Furtlier, no hardcover is proposed fo: the 0-75' zone, <br /> and overall hardcover on the property is proposed at 22.9%, within tlie <br /> 2>% standard of the DNR. <br /> ?J. Tiie west side setback oi 9.5' on:y ncr_urs at � midpoin� corner of the <br /> proposed house, while the majority of the structure «�ill meet the 10' ���est <br /> side setback requirement. Further, the proposed constr�ction ras been <br /> revised such that the setback between the proposed attached garaae and <br /> the detached garage on the neiahboring propem� ezceeds the 10' <br /> r:Zinimum structure-to-structure setback requirement. <br /> F. ihe proposed 8' east side setback, includin� a 10'aJ?' cantile:�er.d se,inent <br /> approximately 6' from the east side lot line, is necessary in order to <br /> maintain a fia_nctional house width for room layout. "fhe hotise iri tot.al <br /> Pa�e 2 of 6 <br />