My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-2009 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
06-22-2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:06:50 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 1:03:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 8, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />PAGE 9 of 12 <br />(5. #09-3404 PAUL AND MEGAN BENNETT, 500 HANLON AVENUE, Continued) <br /> <br />Mattick stated the City Council does have the discretion to waive the fee if it chooses. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the City has imposed double permit fees on other small projects in the past. <br /> <br />Murphy stated a rough estimate of the fees would be $1200. <br /> <br />Bremer commented that one of the reasons for the higher fees is to deter residents from constructing <br />structures without the necessary permits. <br /> <br />Mattick stated one of the options is to tear off the structure and then apply to the City for a building <br />permit. Mattick stated one of the reasons for the higher permit fees is to compensate for the amount of <br />time Staff has devoted to the application. <br /> <br />Murphy indicated he is still looking for some rationale on why this took so long to come before the City <br />Council and that given the circumstances, he is hesitant to waive any fees. <br /> <br />Bennett stated the history of this project is rather extensive and that she was given varying stories and <br />reasons by Staff, which is the major reason for the delay. Bennett noted her husband was sued in criminal <br />court over the failure to obtain a permit and that they attempted to work with the attorney in that situation. <br />They also met with the city administrator in an attempt to avoid the city hiring a criminal attorney to <br />prosecute this case. <br /> <br />Bennett stated also included in the hardcover calculation was a prior variance for an addition, which <br />added to the confusion. Bennett indicated they were not trying to avoid anything in particular and were <br />attempting to work with the City as much as possible to arrive at a reasonable solution. Bennett stated if <br />you look at the correspondence, there has been come confusion over exactly what the rationale is on the <br />City’s part and that they have spent a substantial number of hours trying to resolve this in a way that is <br />favorable for everyone. <br /> <br />Curtis stated there have been instances in the past where homeowner conducted projects have had the <br />double permit fee waived. Curtis stated the initial notice came from the building inspector and that <br />correspondence did go back and forth between the parties for a period of time, with Staff attempting to <br />provide the information being requested. <br /> <br />Franchot stated he has spoken to Megan Bennett about this situation and that in his opinion there was <br />some miscommunication between the parties. In his view a $700 additional penalty is excessive given the <br />relatively small nature of the project. Franchot indicated it was his understanding the applicants thought <br />they were covered under the previous variance. <br /> <br />Franchot moved, White seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5842, a Resolution Granting <br />Variances to Municipal Zoning Code Sections 78-420 and 78-1403, for the Property Located at 500 <br />Hanlon Avenue, with the after-the-fact double zoning application fee being waived but the double <br />building permit fee being imposed as well as any other applicable fees. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Mattick noted the applicants will need to obtain a building permit and pay the double permit fee. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 06/22/09 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 06/08/09 <br />[Page 9 of 12]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.