My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-2009 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
05-11-2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 11:02:45 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 12:53:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 27, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 5 <br />(4. #08-3378 MICHAEL AND JULIE WHITTINGTON, 1981 FAGERENESS POINT <br />ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />maximum allowed is 25 percent. In addition, they are also requesting a variance to allow a <br />swimming pool and pergola lakeward of the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 and recommended approval of a hardcover variance to <br />allow 30.01 percent hardcover in the 75-250 foot zone and denial of the average lakeshore <br />setback variance for the swimming pool and pergola. <br /> <br />Turner noted the recommended hardcover number did not include the retaining walls for the <br />driveway and front entry. The additional hardcover changes Staff’s recommendation to 31.97 <br />percent hardcover and that the City Council should consider the numbers contained in the revised <br />table. Staff feels the property does have issues and that some additional amount of hardcover is <br />necessary. <br /> <br />Murphy noted that the real issue is the swimming pool and pergola. <br /> <br />Whittington indicated they are willing to remove the swimming pool, which would reduce the <br />hardcover. Whittington stated in order to allow for maintenance of the driveway and easier <br />access to the house, they would like a 12 foot wide driveway rather than the recommended 10 <br />foot wide one. This would add approximately 70 square feet of hardcover. Whittington <br />requested they be allowed a deck on the front part of the house and a patio on the back side of the <br />house, which would amount to 460 square feet of hardcover. Whittington noted they are at 43.6 <br />percent hardcover currently and that their proposal reduces the amount of hardcover to 31.97 <br />percent. They are also correcting a number of nonconformities with this project. The house is <br />not extravagant and does not have a full second story. Whittington stated given the topography of <br />the lot, the building sites are limited and that this spot is the best location for the house. <br /> <br />White asked whether Mr. Whittington has just purchased the property. <br /> <br />Whittington indicated he purchased the property in 2002. <br /> <br />Whittington stated the pergola extends into the average lakeshore setback but merely consists of <br />two posts. The pergola is designed to provide some shade rather than them planting some trees, <br />which would truly block the neighbors’ views. <br /> <br />Franchot asked whether the neighbors are supportive of the project. <br /> <br />Whittington indicated the neighbors are very supportive. <br /> <br />Franchot asked whether the house is located right on the average setback line. <br /> <br />Whittington indicated they do have approximately six to eight feet. <br /> <br />Turner illustrated on the overhead the location of the pergola in relation to the average lakeshore <br />setback line. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how far the pergola would extend out. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/11/09 <br />Council Minutes 04/27/09 [Page 5 of 18]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.