My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2009 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2009
>
03-09-2009 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:59:52 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 12:37:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 23, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 5 of 6 <br />*7. HIRE PART-TIME COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER <br /> <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to advertise for and extend offer of hire of a part-time <br />community service officer. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />*8. ACCEPT QUOTATIONS FOR STONEBAY WETLAND CORRECTIONS <br /> <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to accept the quotation in the amount of $45,230.00 from <br />Burschville Construction, Inc., of Hanover, Minnesota, to be funded from the Stonebay LOC <br />proceeds, and authorize the work to be commenced. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />9. PURCHASE BIG ISLAND DOCK <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the first two docks were purchased in 2008 as noted in Staff’s report. <br /> <br />Bremer stated the docks were approved but not purchased. <br /> <br />McMillan moved, Murphy seconded, to approve the purpose of a 100’ dock to be installed at the <br />Big Island Nature Park for an amount not to exceed $41,400. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />*10. AMEND EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK <br /> <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to amend the Employee Handbook to reflect a Thursday <br />payday. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT <br /> <br />City Attorney Mattick had nothing to report. <br /> <br /> <br />11. LICENSES & PERMITS <br /> <br />Franchot asked at what point a residential kennel license is no longer considered residential. <br /> <br />White stated the residence is inspected and that the amount of dogs that should be allowed has been <br />discussed in the past. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she does not believe there is a limit and that it depends on the circumstances. <br /> <br />White stated to his understanding if it is over a particular number, you are required to get the approval of <br />the majority of the neighbors. <br /> <br />Bremer commented the Council did receive a number of public comments when the application on Casco <br />Point was approved, which would help dictate how many animals should be allowed. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the definition of a residential kennel is an accessory use or place is where three or more <br />dogs or five or more cats over six months of age are kept for residential use. Gaffron stated he does not <br />see a maximum limit. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 03/09/09 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02/23/09 <br />[Page 5 of 6]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.