Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 16 <br /> <br />(5. 11-3527 JASON AND JODY SMITH, 2690 RAINEY ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />future connection to Gander Road. The private road outlot has not yet been developed with a road. It <br />currently is wooded land and visually appears merely as part of the applicant's property. However, this <br />configuration makes the east lot line a "side street lot line" with a required "side street yard" of 50 feet in <br />which structures are normally not allowed. <br /> <br />A similar request by the previous owners was made in 2006. The owners at that time were requesting a <br />setback variance to allow a 40-foot setback where a 50-foot setback is required in order to construct a <br />garage addition. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended denial of the former request. <br />However, the City Council voted to approve the requested setback variance. The owners did not <br />construct the addition and the variance has since expired. <br /> <br />At their October meeting, the Planning Commission voted 4 to 1 to recommend denial of the side street <br />setback variance consistent with Staff recommendation. The dissenting Commissioner felt the applicants <br />had demonstrated practical difficulty. <br /> <br />Planning Staff continues to recommend denial of the setback variance for the reasons outlined within <br />Staff's report. <br /> <br />Thompson stated the garage is limited in space and pointed out the entrance to the house that is located in <br />the garage. The practical difficulty is the steps going into the basement protrude into the garage and take <br />away a substantial amount of space to park a car. To address this issue, they are proposing to add a <br />32' x 26' foot garage. <br /> <br />The proposed garage encroaches 12 feet into the setback for the road, which is proposed to be constructed <br />at some unknown point in the future. Without the road, they would be within eight feet of the 30-foot <br />yard setback. The property owners have looked at a number of options for designing the garage and have <br />narrowed it down to this proposal. <br /> <br />The other practical difficulty is a secondary drain field and a number of trees. The primary septic system <br />is also in the way and limits their ability to construct an outbuilding. Thompson stated in his view it is <br />not feasible to construct a building on any other part of the lot. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission had suggested that maybe the garage could be located closer to the street in <br />front of the exiting garage. Due to the layout of the property, it would be a huge eyesore because it would <br />be very noticeable from the street and would change the overall appearance of the home. <br /> <br />Thompson noted the same variance was granted a few years ago but the previous property owners elected <br />not to construct the garage at that time and the variance expired. The previous City Council found that <br />the conditions of the existing property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to the other properties <br />in the zoning district; granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions or create other <br />dangers to the neighboring properties; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants but is <br />necessary to alleviate a practical difficulty to the applicant; the garage is necessary to preserve a <br />substantial property right for the applicants; and the proposal is within the spirit and intent of the zoning <br />code. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 11/28/2011 <br />Approval of Council Meeting Minutes 11/14/2011 <br />[Page 3 of 16]