My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-28-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
11-28-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 11:58:46 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 11:52:44 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 7 of 16 <br /> <br />(6. 11-3528 TIMOTHY AND DANIELLE KOEHLER, 4205 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br />Continued) <br /> <br />numbers result in an unexpectedly high level of hardcover within the 75-250 foot zone, Staff will bring <br />the revised numbers back to Council for review. <br /> <br />Timothy Koehler stated he does not have anything to add to Staff's report and that he is fine with Staff's <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />McMillan noted she is okay with three of the four recommendations. McMillan stated as it relates to the <br />250-500 foot zone, she is okay with additional hardcover due to the turnaround situation as long as it <br />stays under 30 percent. Given the fact that there are not firm hardcover numbers for the 75-250 foot zone, <br />in her view the applicant should conform to the previous resolution. The applicant could reduce the size <br />of the outdoor kitchen patio or another area. It appears the patio is nonfunctional and the outdoor <br />storage/kitchen area is in poor shape. McMillan stated in her view it should all conform to the hardcover <br />numbers contained in the previous resolution for that zone. <br /> <br />Curtis noted the applicant is requesting is 29.1 percent, which is the number their surveyor arrived at for <br />the survey. The applicant has made adjustments in the landscape plan and the discussion with the <br />Planning Commission was based on the landscape plan since the applicant felt that was what they would <br />like to do. The applicant's surveyor based his numbers off of the site visit and off of the intended changes <br />to the driveway. The revision to the landscape plan should be consistent with the resolution. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if they are tearing out the patio and the outdoor kitchen area, in her view this is the time <br />when the hardcover should be brought into compliance. <br /> <br />Koehler noted this is a very small area, and if hardcover is removed from there, it becomes even less <br />functional. They are attempting to replace a patio that was existing since it was not constructed <br />appropriately and they are adding the bare minimum to the driveway. Koehler stated they added gravel at <br />the beginning because it was their understanding that gravel was not considered hardcover. They later <br />found out that it is considered hardcover if it is driven on. <br /> <br />Koehler stated at the Planning Commission meeting they spent a fair amount of time figuring out the least <br />obstrusive way to make the necessary improvements. Koehler indicated if they are required to make <br />additional changes, they will not have time to make the improvements this year and they will have to go <br />through another winter with the existing driveway where they are required to back out on to North Shore <br />Drive. Koehler indicated they will lose the functionality of the driveway and the kitchen area. <br /> <br />McMillan commented the driveway issue appears to be focused in the 250-500 foot zone. <br /> <br />Koehler indicated it is a two-tier driveway and that currently service trucks refuse to come down to their <br />house due to the steepness of the driveway. They are attempting to add a turnaround to address that issue. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is having a difficult time understanding where the different zones are located. <br /> <br />Curtis pointed out the 250-500 foot zone on the overhead. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she does not have a problem with the piece up by the road. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 11/28/2011 <br />Approval of Council Meeting Minutes 11/14/2011 <br />[Page 7 of 16]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.