My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
11-14-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 11:51:48 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 11:45:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 24, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 8 of 19 <br /> <br />(9. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (MCWD) PRESENTATION, Continued) <br /> <br />to regulate it. Jabbour stated the MCWD is concentrating on zebra mussels but that in his view water <br />fowl can transfer milfoil. <br /> <br />Jabbour stated when zebra mussels were found in Lake Minnetonka, they held an emergency meeting and <br />that he encouraged the MCWD to not allow budget or financial restrictions to limit what can be done. At <br />that time it was thought that if the zebra mussel problem was isolated to a certain part of the lake, that it <br />could be treated with copper sulfate, which was not done. <br /> <br />Jabbour stated unfortunately a brief presentation does not give the Council a very good idea of the <br />magnitude of the issues. There was also a discussion about closing the Narrows and Lord Fletchers and <br />how to keep the upper lake separate from the lower lake. Jabbour reiterated that the City Council is not <br />privileged to all of this information and that it is a very complex issue. <br /> <br />The LMCD and White Bear Lake have very unique authority as conservation districts because the state <br />has given them unlimited jurisdiction over surface water. What the LMCD has been doing is probably <br />not satisfactory since we always want them to do more. The DNR also has a number of great employees <br />and has done a great deal with educating the service providers around the lake. <br /> <br />Jabbour stated this summer some legislation was introduced to increase the fines but it did not go <br />anywhere. They also attempted to allow the local cities to retain the money raised by fines so there would <br />be an incentive to issue tickets. The Watershed District also offered to train police officers but got very <br />little response from the police departments. <br /> <br />Jabbour commented it is very difficult to get people up to speed with all the information and that his <br />biggest concern is that the City will have a number of people asking the Council to get rid of all the <br />milfoil in the lake and not focus on the other issues. <br /> <br />Jabbour stated in his opinion the LMCD has not done the job they should have done and that he would <br />like to see a hybrid between the LMCD and the DNR. The City needs to understand the type of authority <br />an agency has before the City backs it. <br /> <br />Jabbour stated in his opinion the MCWD will have a difficult time with the ramps. Jabbour commented <br />there is a substantial amount of infrastructure already in place that could be utilized. <br /> <br />Rahn commented that just focusing on the ramps will not solve the problem but that there is a substantial <br />amount of ramps. <br /> <br />Jabbour noted that Orono has 35 percent of the lakeshore around Lake Minnetonka and share a lake with <br />a number of other cities. Many of those cities would like the MCWD to take over their regulatory <br />authority of their lakeshore and the lake. <br /> <br />There was no further public comment. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the LMCD has had an AIS task force since the 1990s, and that they also experience <br />financial and time constraints. McMillan stated in her view the Watershed Creek could take over some of <br />the functions of the LMCD as it relates to AIS, which could be something they could discuss in the future. <br />McMillan suggested the MCWD work with the DNR and the LMCD on what could possibly be done as <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 11/14/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 10/24/2011 [Page 8 of 19]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.