My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09-26-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 11:08:36 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 11:03:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2011 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 15 of 28 <br /> <br />(10. #11-3521 TAMI HELMER, 3131 CASCO CIRCLE, Continued) <br /> <br />Charlie Jones, 3129 Casco Circle, stated this property has been in his family for 54 years now. It was <br />originally purchased in 1957. In 1977, the lot became part of the adjacent lot on the other side and was <br />subsequently sold off. A variance was granted at that time for the hardcover and for the average setback <br />line. <br /> <br />Jones pointed out the view of the property from his house on the overhead. The hardcover issue relates to <br />replacement of deck hardcover. The original as-built survey indicates that the deck was 8' x 32' and there <br />is no evidence that it was ever approved to be 12' x 32'. <br /> <br />Jones pointed out the hardcover the applicant is proposing to place over existing blacktop. Jones stated <br />the portion that is being removed does not cover the 14-foot addition to the garage or the other area. A <br />portion of the proposed deck juts out further to the lake and also impacts his sightline. According to the <br />building code, it says that it is unlawful to convert, enlarge or alter any structure or use any structure in a <br />manner that violates the hardcover limitations. <br /> <br />Jones indicated he has documents that indicate this property is at 42.9 percent hardcover. He was made <br />aware by Staff that Melanie Curtis is not a surveyor, but somehow new hardcover calculations have come <br />out showing there is 30 percent hardcover. Some of that decrease is from removal of four inch crushed <br />limestone to mitigate a drainage problem that still exists. City Building Code states that nonconforming <br />hardcover may not be located or expanded in any way unless the property is brought into conformance <br />except a roofline may be changed, an additional story may be added over the roofed portions of a <br />structure, or an open or screen porch may be converted into a two or three-season porch. Jones pointed <br />out that this property does not meet any of those exceptions. Jones noted the deck hardcover is being <br />moved over existing hardcover but it is becoming structural coverage and would be totally impervious <br />hardcover consisting of concrete and footings <br /> <br />The setback line was established prior to the house being constructed, which was by agreement between <br />the City of Orono, his grandfather, and the adjoining neighbor. The property is currently nonconforming <br />in three ways. The width of the lot is only 95 feet and it is over on total hardcover. The property is <br />allowed 25 percent but they are at 30 or 31 percent with the present proposal. The proposed screen porch <br />is also located in front of the average setback line. The deck is four feet wider than was originally <br />approved. Four feet of that 32 x 12 foot section that is being used to trade hardcover actually was never <br />approved. As of 1995, the existing calculations on that hardcover were 42.9 percent. <br /> <br />Jones displayed a picture of the current deck and the area of the proposed screen porch. Jones stated the <br />house is 31 feet from the edge of his house, and that according to City Code, this project is not allowed <br />and that he does not see how the Council can go against the rules that they have set up. Jones illustrated <br />the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated that is not the correct setback line. <br /> <br />Rahn noted the average setback line is depicted in their packet. <br /> <br />Jones stated the proposed screen porch is unacceptable. The applicant purchased the property last August <br />but there is no hardship since she could have purchased another property that would have met her needs <br />better. Jones requested the Council follow the rules that are currently in place which states that <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/26/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/12/2011 <br />[Page 15 of 28]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.