Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2011 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 11 of 28   <br />   <br />(7. #11-3518 WILLIAM H. KOCH, 3251 CASCO CIRCLE, Continued) <br /> <br />Franchot noted the applicant's proposal for the patio is to make it a pervious surface. <br /> <br />Rahn pointed out at some point in the future a new owner of the property might not like the patio and rain <br />garden and remove it. The task force has not yet come to a decision regarding pervious surfaces. Rahn <br />stated the driveway is a legitimate issue but that he is not sure where hardcover can be reduced. Rahn <br />stated he would rather have a workable driveway than reduce the hardcover in that area. <br /> <br />Rahn moved, Printup seconded, to approve Application #11-3518, William Koch, 3251 Casco <br />Circle, granting 208 square feet of hardcover for the driveway, granting a conditional use permit to <br />construct the lakeside stairway, but denying the lakeside patio. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City has denied similar patio requests in other applications. <br /> <br />Rahn commented that is typically the case where a new owner would rather have the additional <br />hardcover. <br /> <br />Koch stated the house size is exactly the same as was approved. <br /> <br />Bremer stated it is unique why the lot size has changed and that perhaps the 0-75 is starting back further <br />because the shoreline is eroding. <br /> <br />Koch indicated the shoreline is the same. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the likely difference between the 11,200 and 10,500 is that in 2006 they included the 11 or <br />12 feet by 60 feet in the 250-500 foot zone in the 75-250 foot zone. Gaffron noted he does not have the <br />hardcover calculations from 2006 but that in his opinion that is where the difference comes from. <br /> <br />Mattick stated the Council will need to vote on what is before them now rather than what happened in <br />2006 and that the applicant has no vested right in the variance that was granted in 2006. <br /> <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Franchot Opposed. <br /> <br />*8. #11-3519 BAUER DESIGN BUILD, LLC o/b/o JEM TECHNICAL MARKETING CO., <br />INC., 550 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH, COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW AND <br />EASEMENT VACATION – RESOLUTION NOS. 6072 AND 6073 <br /> <br />Bremer moved, Franchot seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6072, a Resolution Granting <br />Commercial Site Plan Approval for Bauer Design Build, LLC, on Behalf of Ryan Companies and <br />JEM Technical Marketing Co., Inc., for Property Located at 550 Old Crystal Bay Road North. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Bremer moved, Franchot seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6073, a Resolution Vacating a <br />Dedicated Drainage and Utility Easement within the Plat of Crystal Bay Business Center 2nd <br />Addition for the Property Located at 550 Old Crystal Bay Road North. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/26/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/12/2011 <br />[Page 11 of 28]